List Of Police Agencies Targeting Pete Bennett
The Metcalf Attacks are Insider Domestic Terrorism ~ Use the Patriot Act on PG&E
This page is subject to change due to evolving content.
Read how the Driscoll Murder Suicide integrates with Mountain Cascade Construction
Background: I'm a small business and serial entrepreneur but today rebuilding my software operation from an onslaught of disruptive attacks. These incidents we're not your normal gang operations they were done by the the following Police Agencies.
Software Subcontractor
Client: Ravenel Enterprizes
Feb 2011 and July 2011
Lost when car was totaled
Jurisdiction: Lafayette PD
Police Report: Call The US Grand Jury
Risks: Pipelines in your backyard
The project ended when on On July 20th, 2011 my car was totaled in Lafayette CA the Contra Costa Sheriff's department and Lafayette Police who have jurisdiction chose to ignore an attempted murder.
Please visit "Event Chronology" for more detail on 38 years of failed Police Reports.
My life has been upside down since working software projects related to the the San Bruno Gas Line Explosion between Feb 2011 and July 2011 which ended when a retired S.F.P.D. Lieutenant totaled my car in Lafayette CA.
Breach Reported to FBI, PG&E and their internal and outside counsel. Lost: Over 8,000 pages of maps, GPS Coordinates, ManHole Covers, Fiber Optic Entry Points nd pretty much every inch of their Gas Transmission System to thieves.
When my F-250 Truck burst into flames on 680 in August 2004 the truck e
In December 2004 is when I first met Alicia Driscoll, a happy mom seeking to buy her daughter a play structure. I was dealing with my divorce and forced to sell my sons play structure.
In December 2004 is when I first met Alicia Driscoll, a happy mom seeking to buy her daughter a play structure. I was dealing with my divorce and forced to sell my sons play structure.
Coming soon "How the data breach effects the integrity and safety of the PG&E pipeline
PG&E NEWMAN SERVICE CENTER - PG&E NEWMAN SERVICE CENTER located at 309 Merced St in Newman, CA 95360-9536
PG&E Law - Claims Dept. 1850 Gateway Blvd. 6. th. Floor . Concord, CA 94520
PG&E 4th Meeting Room 1850 GATEWAY BLVD CONCORD, CA 94520-3275 (925) 270-2771
Pipeline Operations 375 N WIGET LN, WALNUT CREEK, CA, 945982496
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 226 E Yosemite Ave, Manteca, CA 95336
(209) 825-7513
Arson Network, PG&E and Kinder Morgan
PG&E Law - Claims Dept. 1850 Gateway Blvd. 6. th. Floor . Concord, CA 94520
PG&E 4th Meeting Room 1850 GATEWAY BLVD CONCORD, CA 94520-3275 (925) 270-2771
Pipeline Operations 375 N WIGET LN, WALNUT CREEK, CA, 945982496
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 226 E Yosemite Ave, Manteca, CA 95336
(209) 825-7513
CAL DOJ Commander Wielsch (Federal Prison) links to local fires (arson)
CAL DOJ Commander Wielsch (Federal Prison) links to local fires (arson)
There is a long list of fires, arson and molotov cocktails being hurled at minority owned businesses which are civil rights cases brewing for decades.
There is a long list of fires, arson and molotov cocktails being hurled at minority owned businesses which are civil rights cases brewing for decades.
The Driscoll Murder Suicide Link Mountain Cascade Construction - nearly 10 years later
The Driscoll Murder Suicide Link Mountain Cascade Construction - nearly 10 years later
CPUC Index - California Explosions
This page is subject to change due to evolving content.
Read how the Driscoll Murder Suicide integrates with Mountain Cascade Construction
There are a limited number of Gas Pipeline Explosions in the U.S. but there are several significant incidents in Northern California. The map (pending) will reflect significant fires throughout the region but will expand to
Key Issues with Kinder Morgan Investigation
This may seem abrupt but between 2004 till as August 2014 this resident has endured the Walnut Creek Police many times. Most events nothing more than normal but over time the investigators connected to the Kinder Morgan Fire revealed themselves.
Milestone Events
Key Issues with Kinder Morgan Investigation
This may seem abrupt but between 2004 till as August 2014 this resident has endured the Walnut Creek Police many times. Most events nothing more than normal but over time the investigators connected to the Kinder Morgan Fire revealed themselves.
Milestone Events
- August-2004 Bennett's truck hit by arsonist Agencies on scene - no police reports
- Walnut Creek explosion
- Possible Kinder Morgan witness interwoven with a murder suicide while being connected to
- Mountain Cascade Construction connections to deceased persons
- Cal Fire Pipeline Safety Group - A large failure to communicate
Date: 09/09/2004
Kinder Morgan Fuel Line Explosion and Fire Nov 9th 2004
PG&E Gas Line Explosion
Kinder Morgan Fuel Line Explosion and Fire Nov 9th 2004
- Calfire Pipeline Safety Group
- Walnut Creek Police
- Contra Costa District Attorney
- EBMUD - Won't talk
- CPUC - Barely Cares
- Kinder Morgan
PG&E Gas Line Explosion
- City of San Bruno
- San Bruno Fire
- San Mateo District Attorney
- Calfire Pipeline Safety Group
- CPUC
- PGE
PG&E Information Page
Agencies
Operators
PG&E Pleads Not Guilty! #metoo
SAN BRUNO -- PG&E pleaded not guilty Monday to a new federal criminal indictment on felony charges linked to a fatal 2010 natural gas pipeline explosion here, and hours later, San Bruno officials requested that the state Public Utilities Commission preserve computer drives and digital data that could shed light on ties between the PUC and the utility it oversees.
The city of San Bruno, where eight people were killed in the pipeline explosion, says it's concerned that key emails, texts and other electronic documents, as well as paper documents, voice mails and handwritten notes could vanish amid a current effort by the PUC to swap out hard drives on its computers.
"Not guilty to all counts," Steven Bauer, an attorney for PG&E with law firm Latham & Watkins, said at the brief proceeding Monday before a federal magistrate at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco. Individual employees of PG&E have not been charged in the case, and PG&E executives did not appear at the hearing.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Hallie Hoffman, who appeared for the federal prosecution in the proceeding, said the utility faces a fine of up to $1.13 billion if convicted.
San Bruno City Manager Connie Jackson, and senior adviser Craig Bettencourt leave the federal courthouse following a federal indictment given to PG&E in San Francisco, Calif. on Monday, Aug. 18, 2014. PG&E pleaded not guilty on Monday to a new federal criminal indictment on an array of felony charges connected to a fatal natural gas explosion in San Bruno that could lead to a fine of up to $1.13 billion. (Gary Reyes/Bay Area News Group) ( Gary Reyes )
"Not guilty to all counts," Steven Bauer, an attorney for PG&E with law firm Latham & Watkins, said at the brief proceeding Monday before a federal magistrate at the U.S. District Court in San Francisco. Individual employees of PG&E have not been charged in the case, and PG&E executives did not appear at the hearing.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Hallie Hoffman, who appeared for the federal prosecution in the proceeding, said the utility faces a fine of up to $1.13 billion if convicted.
Following the hearing, San Bruno City Manager Connie Jackson requested that federal prosecutors press for creation of a California pipeline safety trust to help improve natural gas pipes statewide, and to establish an independent monitor to oversee PG&E and the state Public Utilities Commission.
"PG&E has refused to step up and take full responsibility for the explosion," said Jackson, who expressed the city's support for the government prosecution.
San Bruno officials, in a letter to PUC Executive Director Paul Clanon, said it is essential that all electronic equipment, data and documents related to three ongoing investigations into the explosion be preserved and available for public inspection.
"PG&E has refused to step up and take full responsibility for the explosion," said Jackson, who expressed the city's support for the government prosecution.
"Any failure to assure the preservation and protection of all paper and electronic documents related to these proceedings could form the basis of criminal or civil liability for destroying evidence or spoliation of evidence," Jackson wrote in the letter.
One of the federal criminal charges alleges that PG&E deliberately obstructed an investigation of the explosion by the National Transportation Safety Board.
Federal prosecutors also have charged PG&E with 27 alleged violations of pipeline safety rules.
"Based on all of the evidence we have seen to date and our review of the new indictment, we still do not believe that PG&E employees intentionally violated the federal Pipeline Safety Act," PG&E spokesman Greg Snapper said after the hearing. "Even where mistakes were made, employees were acting in good faith."
Separately, San Bruno pointed out that a series of emails between officials with the PUC and PG&E show a cozy relationship between the two organizations.
The latest suggestions of an improper relationship are linked to a cancelled symposium on gas safety sponsored by the state government. PG&E worked closely with the PUC on the symposium, which was canceled after San Bruno officials brought the meeting to light, calling it a "dog-and-pony show" aimed at presenting PG&E in a favorable light.
"This is appalling," Jackson said. "It was our protests that caused the cancellation of that symposium."
The symposium flap is one of numerous instances that suggest close ties between the PUC and PG&E. In some of the emails, PUC President Michael Peevey offered public relations advice to PG&E.
The emails involving the PUC have prompted numerous critics to demand Peevey's ouster.
But in a meeting last week with the editorial board of this newspaper, Gov. Jerry Brown expressed support for Peevey, describing him as "a very effective leader; he gets things done."
San Bruno says that the PUC, under Peevey's leadership, has fostered close ties with PG&E that are improper. "PG&E is pulling the strings at the PUC," Jackson said.
The Pipeline Safety Act ~ Reference Page
The Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 was designed to examine and improve the state of pipeline safety regulation. The Act:
- Reauthorizes PHMSA's federal pipeline safety programs through fiscal year 2015
- Provides the regulatory certainty necessary for pipeline owners and operators to plan infrastructure investments and create jobs
- Improves pipeline transportation by strengthening enforcement of current laws and improving existing laws where necessary
- Ensures a balanced regulatory approach to improving safety that applies cost-benefit principles
- Protects and preserves Congressional authority by ensuring certain key rulemakings are not finalized until Congress has an opportunity to act
Federal Pipeline Safety Policy
Here we provide a brief primer on federal pipeline safety law, the language of the current law, access to federal pipeline safety regulations and enforcement information, and information about recent developments in pipeline safety regulation.
Here we provide a brief primer on federal pipeline safety law, the language of the current law, access to federal pipeline safety regulations and enforcement information, and information about recent developments in pipeline safety regulation.
- A brief history of federal pipeline safety laws
- Pipeline Safety Regulatory Certainty and Job Creation Act of 2011 (pdf)
- Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006 (pdf)
- Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (pdf, 166kb)
- Federal pipeline safety regulations http://www.phmsa.dot.gov/pipeline/regs
- Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS)
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) http://www.ferc.gov/about/ferc-does.asp
- National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) http://www.ntsb.gov/about/office_rph.html
- Read the open recommendations of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to PHMSA by clicking here
CAL FIRE PIPELINE Safety Division
Please read related Posts Ellen Sadudaquaria
Final Report of Kinder Morgan LS-16 Walnut Creek Accident. (Posted on 07/06/2005) |
Item 3 - USA/North Ticket Data. Or you can view the whole Report by click here. |
The Dead Contra Costa Witness Program - Take em down before they can talk
The Dead Contra Costa Witness Program
Take em' down
Before they can talk
Recycle the MO enough times it becomes
OBVIOUS
Identifying the 680 Arsonist leads to solving the Gas Pipeline Explosions @senfeinstein
Find the 680 Buy Scout Arsonist and you'll find Alicia Driscoll's killers
Abstract: In this article I will correlate why my 2004 Truck fire will lead to solving all the fires in Contra Costa County. Several of these fires occurred in Rossmoor that will lead from the Limo Fire on Skycrest to the Limo Fire on the San Mateo Bridge which could lead to the deadly FedEx Truck Fire where students heading northbound Interstate 5 in preparation of attending college.
I've developed a highly plausible theory on the uncomfortable theory the real story is this was Domestic Terrorism for legal profit which is theoretically linked to my 200 Arson case and how Law Enforcement in Contra Costa County have covered up decades of arson cases as fires.
From there I will argue that the sum of these events connect to the PG&E San Bruno Explosion and the Walnut Creek Explosions. The only two North American Gas Line Explosions that resulted in significant deaths occurred in the same geographic region but worse had the Municipal Pooling Authority, EBMUD and Contra Costa Law Enforcement had done their job then we'd know the truth about the The Dead Contra Costa Witness Program or that perhaps my efforts connected to my 2004 Truck Fire are being derailed to cover up the obvious that it was attempted murder.
Abstract: In this article I will correlate why my 2004 Truck fire will lead to solving all the fires in Contra Costa County. Several of these fires occurred in Rossmoor that will lead from the Limo Fire on Skycrest to the Limo Fire on the San Mateo Bridge which could lead to the deadly FedEx Truck Fire where students heading northbound Interstate 5 in preparation of attending college.
I've developed a highly plausible theory on the uncomfortable theory the real story is this was Domestic Terrorism for legal profit which is theoretically linked to my 200 Arson case and how Law Enforcement in Contra Costa County have covered up decades of arson cases as fires. From there I will argue that the sum of these events connect to the PG&E San Bruno Explosion and the Walnut Creek Explosions. The only two North American Gas Line Explosions that resulted in significant deaths occurred in the same geographic region but worse had the Municipal Pooling Authority, EBMUD and Contra Costa Law Enforcement had done their job then we'd know the truth about the The Dead Contra Costa Witness Program or that perhaps my efforts connected to my 2004 Truck Fire are being derailed to cover up the obvious that it was attempted murder.
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings
18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or
Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress-
Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
April 1, 2014 PG&E Charged With Multiple Violations Of The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
PG&E Charged With Multiple Violations Of The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 1, 2014
SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. - On April 1, 2014, a federal grand jury for the Northern District of California returned an indictment charging Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E") with multiple violations of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 ("PSA"), announced U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen M. Wagstaffe, U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General Special Agent in Charge William Swallow, and FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson. PSA violations were uncovered in the course of an investigation initiated after the fatal San Bruno natural gas pipeline explosion in 2010.
The indictment alleges that PG&E knowingly and willfully violated the PSA and its regulations between 2003 and 2010. According to the indictment, the charges stem from PG&E's record keeping and pipeline "integrity management" practices. The indictment alleges that PG&E failed to address recordkeeping deficiencies concerning its larger natural gas pipelines knowing that their records were inaccurate or incomplete.
The indictment also alleges that PG&E failed to identify threats to its larger natural gas pipelines and that PG&E did not take appropriate actions to investigate the seriousness of threats to pipelines when they were identified. In addition, the indictment alleges that PG&E failed to adequately reprioritize and assess threatened pipelines after the pipelines were over pressurized as required by the PSA and its regulations.
"The citizens of Northern California deserve to have their utility providers put the safety of the community first," said U.S. Attorney Haag. "Today's indictment of PG&E for violating the minimum safety standards established by the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act reflects the company's failure to follow that very basic principle. This investigation is the result of strong collaboration among federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities, the California Attorney General's Office, and the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office. I look forward to continuing to work closely with these partners in our efforts to hold PG&E accountable for their disregard for the safety of our community."
"Today's indictment is an important step in providing justice for the individuals, families and community devastated by the 2010 pipeline explosion and fire in San Bruno," said California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris. "As alleged in the indictment, PG&E knowingly and willfully failed to identify and evaluate threats to its transmission pipelines, including Line 132 underneath much of San Bruno. When allegedly faced with evidence of transmission line problems, PG&E knowingly and willfully chose not to assess and remediate the problems. My office will continue our work with local and federal partners in prosecuting this matter in federal court and holding PG&E accountable for its alleged conduct."
"The indictment returned by the Grand Jury is an important step in holding PG&E criminally responsible for their willful misconduct," said San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen M. Wagstaffe. "The San Bruno Police Department and my office will continue to support and work closely with the offices of the United States Attorney and the California Attorney General to bring PG&E to justice."
"Pipeline safety is a top priority for the Department of Transportation and the Office of Inspector General," said William Swallow, DOT OIG regional Special Agent-in-Charge. "The lasting impacts among families and the community stemming from the tragic explosion in San Bruno remind us of why it is important to exercise vigorous management and oversight. The DOT OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement and prosecutorial colleagues to ensure that parties responsible for protecting public health and safety are held to the highest standards."
"The Federal Pipeline Safety Act is designed to guard against risks to life or property in the course of distributing goods and services to entrusting consumers," said FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson of the San Francisco Field Office. "This office has the responsibility not only to uphold and enforce the criminal laws of the United States but also to do everything we can to protect the public. The charges alleged in this indictment should be symbolic of the FBI's commitment to serving justice no matter how long it takes."
PG&E is charged with 12 separate violations of the PSA. The maximum statutory penalty for each count for a corporation is $500,000 or a fine based on the gain the corporation made as a result of the violation or the loss caused to victims.
An indictment merely alleges that crimes have been committed, and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
The prosecution is the result of a three-year investigation conducted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California, the California Attorney General's Office, the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, the United States Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, the FBI, the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration, and the city of San Bruno Police Department.
Arraignment on the indictment in the United States Magistrate Court has not yet been scheduled. Electronic court filings and further procedural and docket information are available athttps://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl.
USDOJ: PG&E Indictment Obstruction Of The Investigation
PG&E Charged With Obstruction Of The Investigation Of The National Transportation Safety Board And Additional Violations Of The Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 29, 2014
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal grand jury for the Northern District of California returned a superseding indictment charging Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) with obstruction of the investigation of the National Transportation Safety Board ("NTSB"), as well as additional violations of the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968 (PSA), announced U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen M. Wagstaffe, U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General Special Agent in Charge William Swallow, and FBI Special Agent in Charge David J. Johnson.The superseding indictment alleges that PG&E obstructed the NTSB's investigation that began immediately after the deadly San Bruno explosion. According to the superseding indictment, during the course of the NTSB's investigation, PG&E provided a version of a policy outlining the way in which PG&E addressed manufacturing threats on its pipelines. PG&E later withdrew that policy claiming it was produced in error, and was an unapproved draft. In fact, PG&E was operating under the so-called unapproved draft from 2009 through April 5, 2011. The consequence of this practice was that PG&E did not prioritize as high-risk, and properly assess, many of its oldest natural gas pipelines, which ran through urban and residential areas.
Additionally, the superseding indictment charges PG&E with 27 counts of knowingly and willfully violating the PSA. These charges stem from PG&E's record keeping and pipeline "integrity management" practices. The superseding indictment alleges that PG&E failed to address recordkeeping deficiencies concerning its larger natural gas pipelines knowing that their records were inaccurate or incomplete. The superseding indictment also alleges that PG&E failed to identify threats to its larger natural gas pipelines and that PG&E did not take appropriate actions to investigate the seriousness of threats to pipelines when they were identified. Finally, the superseding indictment alleges that PG&E failed to adequately reprioritize and assess threatened pipelines after the pipelines were over pressurized as required by the PSA and its regulations.
PG&E is charged with one count of obstruction of an agency proceeding in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1505, and 27 separate counts of violations of the PSA. The maximum statutory penalty for each count is a $500,000 fine or a fine based on the twice the gross gain PG&E made as a result of the violations, or twice the losses suffered by the victims. The superseding indictment alleges that PG&E derived gross gains of $281 million, and victims suffered losses of approximately $565 million. PG&E is next scheduled to appear on August 18, 2014 before the Honorable Thelton E. Henderson, United States District Judge.
Kim A. Berger and Hallie M. Hoffman are the Assistant U.S. Attorneys who are prosecuting the case, with the assistance of Alycee Lane and Pat Mahoney, along with Deputy Attorneys General Brett Morris and Deborah Halberstadt from the California Attorney General's Office. The prosecution is the result of an investigation conducted by the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, the United States Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, the FBI, the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration, and the city of San Bruno Police Department.
Kim A. Berger and Hallie M. Hoffman are the Assistant U.S. Attorneys who are prosecuting the case, with the assistance of Alycee Lane and Pat Mahoney, along with Deputy Attorneys General Brett Morris and Deborah Halberstadt from the California Attorney General's Office. The prosecution is the result of an investigation conducted by the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, the United States Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, the FBI, the Pipeline and Hazardous Material Safety Administration, and the city of San Bruno Police Department.
Please note, an indictment contains only allegations and, as with all defendants, PG&E must be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
)Related Cases Index
Walnut Creek Suicides - Brace Yourself
Window jumpers is not something you see around Walnut Creek.It's a small city of an estimated population of 65,695 (2012) and is not known for being Suicide Alley. There have been jumpers from BART, Nordstroms, Treat Blvd Overcrossing, Kaiser, BART Tracks and
Action
.jpg&container=blogger&gadget=a&rewriteMime=image%2F*)
Councilman Gary Bell - August 1st 2013
When Gary Bell became ill in just days before the election the memory and when word slipped out he had meningitis whof Mike Shimansky who just died a few years earlier of meningitis which was on the heels of Supervisor Glover's near fatal infection.
Metcalf Sniper Attack San Jose CA
A recent 2014 Wall Street Journal article suggested that this sniper attack was probably the gravest attack on U.S Soil since 9/11 that the attack was well planned with Armored Piercing bullets. In June 2014 someone sent several rounds to the tires of someone connected to a Federal Agent,Last summer someone connected to the San Francisco Federal Building was killed locally to the Bay Area.
Suspected Related Walnut Creek Incidents
2001 Doc's Pharmacy
I've known the owner of Doc's Pharmacy since 1978. It was his business that endured this major setback.
Jamie Sheets worked at the same Safeway where someone has targeted me.
ssss
Bootstrap Development
Custom Bootstrap Development
The Bootstrap race is on and most developers focus on the pretty interfaces this developer is building databases, controls (ASCX), embedded scripts and widgets.
Bootstrapping For Homeless and Blogging For Bettering Society
In 2010 I became homeless over events building up with my very personal connection to a local scandal involving police officers.
