Gaspipelineexplosions.com

EnergyTerrorism.com

Showing posts with label CPUC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPUC. Show all posts

Domestic Terrorism or Insider Terrorism

Accident or Deliberate 

After personally enduring endless harassment with certain but mostly now former Contra Costa County Law Enforcement Officials all apparently stemming untimely coincidental connections linked to serial tragedies the cards have turned.

The surreal collection of incidents near those known to me which have impacted everything from businesses, to personal friends and relatives or family.  When Officer Youngstrom was murdered on SB -680, I already had police reports on file where the Youngstrom/Bennett informal converstation was recorded in the Walnut Creek Starbucks on N. Main Street around March 2012 and there he is shot dead but worse investigated by the famous DA Investigations Team functioning under Contra Costa District Attorney Mark Peterson who in June 2017 pled guilty to Perjury.

He took the deal so he could squeal.

The list of the deceased is long enough that most would fold on victim #2, I held on years watching my friends get slaughtered.

The Dubious Cases
What I never expected to find was dead witnesses but I also never expected to link the November 2004 Kinder Morgan Gas Line Explosion to Alicia Driscoll and Mountain Cascade.  Sometimes life is a coincidence and sometimes it's a conspiracy.  This case is a conspiracy between Civil Attorneys, The Grand Jury, investigators and this Arson Victim who discovered connections between the 2010 PG&E Fire, his 2004 Arson and failures up and down the investigative trail.

The worst part is someone referenced these witness deaths as unfortunate.

Click here and take a long look at this little girl.


View details »

The Deceased

--
ssss
--
View details »

Share:

How to Calculate the Required Capacity kVA Rating or Amperage Capacity for Single and Three Phase Transformers

When taking bullets I bleed for my country 

How to Calculate the Required Capacity kVA Rating or Amperage Capacity for Single and Three Phase Transformers

Share:

PG&E Self-Reports Additional Emails to CPUC







PG&E Self-Reports Additional Emails to CPUC
SAN FRANCISCO — PG&E today (Oct. 6) reported additional communications that it believes violated California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) rules governing ex parte communications with the state regulator. Ex parte communications are those that take place with decision-makers without the knowledge of all parties to a proceeding.
The communications were identified in conjunction with PG&E’s voluntary internal review of more than 65,000 emails exchanged with the CPUC over a nearly five-year period, which has been concluded. In addition, PG&E has been notified by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in San Francisco that it has begun an investigation in connection with these ex parte communications, with which the company will cooperate.
“We’ve made it clear that we are committed to complying with both the letter and the spirit of the law and PG&E’s own Code of Conduct at all times. No excuses. Our customers and the communities we serve expect no less. We took immediate and definitive action, self-reported these violations, held individuals accountable and are making significant changes designed to prevent this from happening again,” said PG&E Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Tony Earley.
The communications being reported today are in addition to email communications that the company self-reported on September 15 involving the pending Gas Transmission & Storage rate case. Of the ex parte communications being reported today, one involved a series of emails between a PG&E officer and a CPUC commissioner. The other communication involved an email from a PG&E officer to his supervisor summarizing an oral communication with a CPUC commissioner. The two PG&E personnel involved in these communications are no longer working at the company as a result of the emails that were self-reported earlier.
In conjunction with self-reporting the first set of emails, PG&E announced:
  • That three officers will no longer be employed by the company.
  • The appointment of a new senior vice president of regulatory affairs.
  • The creation of the new role of chief regulatory compliance officer, whose mandate is to help oversee compliance with all requirements governing PG&E’s interactions with the CPUC. The position reports to the CEO and to the Audit Committee of the PG&E Board of Directors.
  • The engagement of former Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior Ken Salazar, a partner in the WilmerHale law firm, as special counsel on regulatory compliance matters to assist in developing a best-in-class regulatory compliance model. Salazar has deep experience in regulatory and energy matters.
  • A commitment to creating updated and enhanced training for all employees who routinely interact with PG&E’s regulators.
In a filing with the Commission last week, PG&E admitted the violations in the pending Order to Show Cause and said it expects a penalty. PG&E is scheduled to appear before the Commission regarding the penalty tomorrow.
Today’s PG&E notifications to the CPUC can be read here.
Share:

The JFK Assassination Link




Share:

WilmerHale.com - Court Ordered Ethics

The Kennedy Connections to Pete Bennett 

There is an undeniable connection between David L. Milne and Joseph P. Kennedy where each descendant has endured serial tragedies.
Learn more

Heading

Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Fusce dapibus, tellus ac cursus commodo, tortor mauris condimentum nibh, ut fermentum massa justo sit amet risus. Etiam porta sem malesuada magna mollis euismod. Donec sed odio dui.
View details »
Bootstrap Thumbnail First

Source of the Losses 

The sum total of events have destroyed my finances. In Danville someone stole my my $40,000 coin collection, my inheritance of $400,000 was taken with the help of police officers, attorneys and others.
In 2004 persons near Alamo 1st Ward began a well planned campaign and now ten years later I'm still getting attacked. If my theory that my 2004 Arson threads to the Gas Line Explosions then the weight of these disasters would give ample reason to for persons to silence me and they've known my efforts long before I connected the fires. Check back soon for details on how to donate
Action 
Bootstrap Thumbnail Second

JFK Assassination, The Formulation of the SEC and the American Institute of Accountants.  

Much to my personal astonishment David L. Milne of Patterson Teele and Dennis located at 120 Broadway New York accountants to Joseph P. Kennedy Enterprises and The Park Agency.  The source of the Kennedy fortune began at 230 Park Ave New York was walking distance from 417 Park Ave New York NY.




Thumbnail label

Cras justo odio, dapibus ac facilisis in, egestas eget quam. Donec id elit non mi porta gravida at eget metus. Nullam id dolor id nibh ultricies vehicula ut id elit.
Share:

WALNUT CREEK / Blast kills 2, puts 6 in hospital / Fuel line erupts in flame at work site; 2 missing

Cnetscandal.blogspot.com
The American Investment Business Model
Turn and Burn, Torch and Go


The Deadly Explosion

A child was murdered connected to this explosion so Contra Costa District Attorney could spit the 15 Million Dollar Fine.  Another Cold Case County confidential settlement.
Past Projects
Related
Meredith May, Demian Bulwa, Carrie Sturrock and Leslie Fulbright, Chronicle Staff Writers
Published 4:00 am, Wednesday, November 10, 2004
Adri Riley (cq) (left) and Sarah Potter run with their pet dogs out of the Diablo Pointe apartment complex at 1450 Creekside Drive in Walnut Creek.They were told to evacuate because of fear of further ... more
A fireball several stories high roared out of the ground near downtown Walnut Creek on Tuesday, killing two construction workers, injuring six and leaving two workers missing after a crew accidentally cut an underground jet fuel line. The blast occurred about a quarter-mile away from the intersection of Newell Avenue and South Broadway, where two crews contracted by Mountain Cascade Inc. of Livermore were installing a large water main for the East Bay Municipal Utility District. One group of workers was welding in a trench, and a second group was digging another trench with a backhoe that apparently broke a pipeline that carries aviation fuel from Concord to the San Jose International Airport, said EBMUD spokesman Charles Hardyand Walnut Creek police investigating the accident.
Cnetscandal.blogspot.com
Walnut Creek Explosion: Cal/OSHA Issues Multi-Employer Citation ... May 5, 2005 - 9, 2004 fatally injuring 5 employees and seriously injuring 4 others. ... Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), Kinder Morgan Energy Partners,

Ellen Sabaduquia, 54, of Walnut Creek was driving on Broadway at 1:30 p.m. when the inferno shot out of the ground a few feet from her Toyota minivan. She watched in horror as two screaming men emerged from the hole, engulfed in flames. "I thought I was in Fallujah for a moment," Sabaduquia told The Chronicle, her voice trembling. "It almost looked like slow motion from a horror movie." Sabaduquia said she wanted to get out and pick up the workers, but the flames were too ferocious and she was forced to throw her vehicle into reverse. The six workers who were injured were all burned -- three critically, authorities said.
Those with the worst injuries were airlifted to Doctors Medical Center in San Pablo in critical condition with burns over 40 to 60 percent of their bodies, said hospital spokeswoman Paula Ferron. Two victims were airlifted to John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek with burns so severe they were transported again to a burn center at UC Davis, according to a hospital spokeswoman. There was no information available on the sixth burn victim.
Initial reports by authorities had three workers dead, but later in the evening police said that they had confirmed two fatalities and retrieved the bodies of those victims. Authorities did not disclose the names of the dead or the missing. The accident sparked a series of underground explosions, sent a huge column of black smoke into the sky, burned one home and damaged several others on Doris Avenue, and prompted the evacuations of Las Lomas High School and Muirwood Elementary. "This is the worst day of my life," said Bill Williams of Mountain Cascade, general contractor for EBMUD's $180 million Walnut Creek-San Ramon Valley Improvement Project to increase water flow in the area.
Williams fielded phone calls Tuesday afternoon from worried wives and scanned work rosters to try to figure out who was unaccounted for. The explosion rattled shops at nearby Broadway Plaza and caused students to jump in their seats.
The force was so intense it blew out the windows of several apartments on Creekside Drive across the street and charred the cab of an 18-wheeler parked near the construction site. Initially, firefighters were prevented from approaching the searing hot flames, so they were forced to keep the public away and wait for the gasoline to burn out. Firefighters capped the pipeline at cutoff valves in Concord and Alamo, and the inferno receded about 90 minutes later, said Steve Maiero, battalion chief of the Contra Costa Fire Protection District.
They discovered two bodies in or near the hole, Maiero said. The jet fuel line, owned by Kinder Morgan Energy Partners of Houston, was marked on maps that construction workers were using, according to Eugene Braithwaite, director of operations for the company's northern region.
Kinder Morgan is under investigation in a separate incident in which 85,000 gallons of fuel spilled from one of its pipelines into the Suisun Marsh last April. Braithwaite said as soon as it was safe, Kinder Morgan would assess how to clean up the Walnut Creek pipe break, possibly using vacuum pumps to remove any residual fuel. A few Doris Avenue residents spent the night with friends or in hotels with help from the Red Cross. Among them were Enos and Leto Chabot, who lost the back half of their two-story home at 2053 Doris Ave. The fireball rose 90 feet from the construction pit, up a concrete wall and burned their entire backyard, melting the windows on their back wall. The couple were having lunch at the Hick'ry Pit restaurant nearby when they heard the boom, and they returned home to find their neighbors evacuated to a street corner a few blocks away. "The important thing is we're OK," said Leto Chabot. "We have insurance, but this will take months to get fixed." At Las Lomas High, Sarah Jones, 16, said she was in her physics class when she heard what she thought was someone dropping something on the roof.
Students were instructed over the loudspeaker to stay inside, then told to evacuate to Civic Park. They could see the plume of black smoke from the parking lot. "I don't think we were so much scared as confused," Jones said. "Because nobody told us what was going on."
 The evacuation went smoothly, however, because nearly all the students had cell phones and could call their parents to come get them. Only about 50 of the school's 1,700 students made it to Civic Park, and the rest went to downtown coffee shops and juice bars to wait for their parents. As darkness fell, authorities used a robot to shoot close-up photographs of the accident scene.
Share:

Chevron CEO David J. O'Reilly and Danville CA Explosion in 2004 (Arson / Attempted Murder)

 image
Alamo CA  -The following statements emanate from five years of researching who rigged my F-250 to explode.  There is a connection to my divorce, rouge police officers, multiple US Grand Jury Indictments related to a story called the “Dirty DUI” to a San Ramon CA law firm and a real estate investment trust (REIT) under FremontGroup.com where I found O’Reilly with Attorney Rick Kopf from Bennett v. Southern where my witness was murdered. 
 
David J. O'Reilly
Born: 1947
Birthplace: Dublin, Ireland
Gender: Male
Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Straight
Occupation: Business
Nationality: Ireland
Executive summary: CEO of Chevron, 2005-09
Wife: Joan Gariepy (nurse, m. 1970, two children)
Chevron CEO (2005-09)
Chevron Texaco CEO (2001-05)
Chevron CEO (2000-01)
Chevron Vice Chairman (1998-2000)
Chevron President of Chevron Products Co. (1994-98)
Chevron VP (1991-94)
Chevron Senior VP and COO of Chevron Chemical Co. (1989-91)
Chevron (1968-89)
    Member of the Board of Chevron (as Chairman, 2000-01 and 2005-09)
    Member of the Board of Chevron Texaco (as Chairman, 2001-05)
JP Morgan Chase International Council
American Petroleum Institute Executive Committee
See  
San Francisco Symphony Board of Governors
New!
Create a map starting with
Requires Flash 7+ and Javascript.


































Share:

PG&E to face criminal charges in trial linked to San Bruno blast

GasCanMan-mcfadden-golub-darbee-peevery[2]

The PG&E Gas Can Man is either a ghost or the secret sauce needed to prove domestic terrorism. 
Top
Nancy McFadden PG&E COS now employed by Jerry Brown
Howard V.  Golub who has a son my sons age tutored by his classmate – my son whose friend was Ryan Fuchs killed in Danville. 
Peter A. Darbee lives 1.3 miles from accident scene where my car was totaled in Lafayette.
Michael Peevey whose stupidity was thinking they could rigged or stage accidents to shift burden to Rate Payers. 
 
 
By George Avalos, gavalos@bayareanewsgroup.com
POSTED:   06/13/2016 03:29:00 PM PDT | UPDATED:   118 MIN. AGO
SAN BRUNO -- In a federal trial that could bring closure to San Bruno residents devastated by the 2010 pipeline disaster, PG&E faces an array of criminal charges linked to the explosion that killed eight people and demolished a Peninsula neighborhood.
Jury selection for the trial, in which PG&E faces 13 criminal counts, is scheduled to begin Tuesday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco. The charges include one count of obstruction of a federal probe into the blast and 12 counts that it violated pipeline safety regulations. If convicted on all 13 charges, the utility giant could be fined up to $562 million.
File photo: Crews load  an abandoned segment of pipe that was once part of the gas line that exploded in San Bruno last year.in San Bruno , Calif., on
File photo: Crews load an abandoned segment of pipe that was once part of the gas line that exploded in San Bruno last year.in San Bruno , Calif., on Friday , July 29 , 2011. (JOHN GREEN/Staff archives)
Investigators believe the deadly explosion was caused by a lethal combination of negligence, poor record keeping and lazy oversight. Federal prosecutors are likely to contend in the trial that PG&E's hunger to harvest a bumper crop of profits from ratepayers caused the company to neglect the safety of its customers.
"PG&E's willful decisions not to maintain records, conduct proper pipeline assessments and otherwise comply with federal pipeline safety regulations were part of a corporate culture of prioritizing profits over safety," federal prosecutors wrote in papers filed in November with the federal court.
PG&E has pleaded not guilty to all the charges.
Advertisement
"The San Bruno explosion was a tragic accident, and we have demonstrated our accountability," said Greg Snapper, a PG&E spokesman. "We have seen no evidence that PG&E employees intentionally violated the Pipeline Safety Act or obstructed justice."
City officials in San Bruno are eager for the long-delayed trial to begin.
"We believe PG&E is guilty of a dereliction of its duty to protect the citizens of San Bruno and customers all over their service area," San Bruno Mayor James Ruane said in an interview with this newspaper. "We hope this trial will bring about justice and transparency, which PG&E has not opened up to."
San Francisco-based PG&E has undertaken numerous steps to upgrade and repair its vast web of natural gas pipelines, including the construction of a gas-control facility that serves as a high-tech nerve center for its pipeline system.
Still, company officials did not answer the question directly when asked recently why, if PG&E has demonstrated accountability for the Sept. 9, 2010, disaster, the utility did not plead guilty to the criminal charges.
"It is one thing to accept responsibility for the obvious facts of an explosion and the damage and destruction that was caused," said San Bruno City Manager Connie Jackson. "But it is another thing entirely to accept true responsibility for the negligence that caused the system to fail and create the disaster."
State regulators in April 2015 hit PG&E with a $1.6 billion penalty for causing the explosion, the largest financial punishment ever imposed on an American utility.
"It is rare for corporations to actually go on trial," said Peter Henning, a professor of law with Wayne State University in Detroit. "PG&E may feel they have already gotten a black eye in public. Sometimes corporations draw a line in the sand and tell the prosecutors to prove their case."
Among the high-profile witnesses who are expected to be called to bolster the prosecution's case is former PG&E Chief Executive Peter Darbee, the company's top boss in the years before the explosion and when the blast occurred. Darbee received a $34.8 million severance package when he left the company in 2011.
Prosecutors also intend to call Leslie McNiece, a former PG&E executive, as a witness. McNiece is expected to testify she encountered opposition and pushback from top company executives in connection with her PG&E-ordered task of improving the utility's record keeping on its pipelines.
Eight current or former PG&E executives have received court-ordered immunity, according to case documents filed by the U.S. attorney's office. Darbee is not getting immunity.
Brian Cherry, a former PG&E regulatory executive who received immunity, will testify about the utility's statements to the PUC and the National Transportation Safety Board regarding an array of issues, including company policies about gas pipe pressure and pipeline records.
William Hayes, a PG&E gas operations executive who was a company representative for the NTSB probe into the explosion, will testify about the utility's policies regarding when it would test for problems in older pipelines -- and what PG&E told the NTSB about those policies.
"This is at the heart of the obstruction charge," prosecutors said in court papers.
The original indictment against PG&E came in April 2014. The trial was initially set to begin in March, but a flurry of motions by PG&E's defense team delayed the start of the trial several times.
"There have been a lot of tricks and a lot of delays by PG&E," said state Sen. Jerry Hill, whose San Mateo County district includes San Bruno. "Almost six years after the explosion, people will finally see some justice in this, and the families may be able to go on with their lives."
Contact George Avalos at 408-859-5167. Follow him at Twitter.com/georgeavalos.
































Share:

Brown Adviser Investigated For Stock Nondisclosure

Brown Adviser Investigated For Stock Nondisclosure

DAILY JOURNAL OF LOS ANGELES

The Fair Political Practices Commission opened an investigation into Nancy E. McFadden, a former senior vice president at Pacific Gas & Electric Co., after receiving a complaint that she advised Gov. Jerry Brown on energy-related legislation and appointments to regulatory boards in 2011 and 2012 while holding $1 million in energy-related stock.
The commission said it would limit its inquiry to McFadden’s failure to disclosure the stock holdings on economic interest statements in lieu of a larger conflict-of-interest investigation, citing insufficient evidence.
“For her not to have recused herself on utility matters is an outrageous abuse of public trust, and the FPPC must be using a standard to convict when they say ‘insufficient evidence’” said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog. The nonprofit law firm filed the 57-page complaint this month, attaching emails, economic filings, and timelines linking energy stock price fluctuations to gubernatorial decisions and state legislation McFadden worked on or had knowledge of before they became public in 2011 and 2012.
“When you have emails between Public Utilities Commissioners talking about who’s going to be appointed next to appease energy investors, and they write ‘Nancy said to send resumes,’ and those officials are now under criminal investigation or serving as government witnesses themselves, you would think that’s a sufficient basis to open an investigation,” Court added.
McFadden is executive secretary to Brown. She served during his first term beginning in 1975 and was senior advisor to former Gov. Gray Davis. McFadden has been described as Brown’s top aide and chief liaison to the Legislature, as well as a possible successor to State Attorney General Kamala D. Harris.
A response to the FPPC complaint made public by the governor’s office asserted that profits from stock sales are not required disclosures under the state’s Political Reform Act.
“It’s not surprising that the FPPC found these conflict of interest allegations totally baseless and will not pursue an investigation,” said Evan Westrup, press secretary to the governor. “We have already acknowledged inadvertent filing errors, and amended [economic interest statements] have already been re-filed with the FPPC to clear this up.”
According to Gov Code Section 82030(b)(5), reportable income excludes stock holdings “except for proceeds from the sale of these securities.”
But subdivision (b)(12) adds that stock sale profits do not have to be reported as long as “the filer sells…and does not know or have reason to know the identity of the purchaser.”
Consumer Watchdog said the impropriety stems not from who paid her for the stocks, but whether her sales were timed to profit from pro-utility policies she helped shape or knew about from working in the Capitol.
“Ms. McFadden had a standing order known to PG&E and her financial advisor to sell those options as soon as they vested, regardless of price; those orders were automatically carried out the same day,” the response to the complaint from the governor’s office states.
Additional disclosures filed with the response reveal McFadden also had up to $100,000 in stock options from Linn Energy, most of which has since been sold.
“Neither Ms. McFadden, nor her financial advisor, had knowledge these options existed,” and sold them upon discovery “without regard to share price,” the governor’s office continued.
The nonprofit said it would expand its investigation through 2015 and file additional complaints in light of fracking-related legislation that may have affected Linn Energy share prices.
“I’m a certified fraud examiner, and in terms of gathering sufficient evidence I wouldn’t allow the FPPC to discuss the case with the press secretary or have him answer on her behalf,” said Michael J. Aguirre, a former city attorney of San Diego who unearthed the emails detailing meetings between investors and government officials. “This is Ms. McFadden’s personal obligation.”
Share:

Former Seeno company president sues three family members

 

By Matthias Gafni Contra Costa Times
POSTED:   07/12/2012 05:16:57 PM PDT | UPDATED:   4 YEARS AGO
Click photo to enlarge

Seeno employees talking with a person in a white Sports Utility Vehicle are reflected in the...
In the latest flurry of Seeno-related legal troubles, a second executive from the family's failed Nevada company sued three members of the family and their associates this week, accusing them of racketeering involving such criminal activities as extortion, tax fraud, and mail and wire fraud.
Bradley Mamer, the former president and CEO of Wingfield Nevada Group, a company founded by former Nevada lobbyist Harvey Whittemore and eventually co-owned by two Seeno brothers, sued former bosses Albert Seeno Jr., Albert Seeno III, Thomas Seeno, Michael Ghiorso and Kevin McCauley on Wednesday in a Nevada federal court, asking for more than $500,000 in damages.
The lawsuit paints an unflattering portrait of Albert Seeno Jr. and Albert Seeno III -- who have operated a Concord-based group of development and contracting companies for decades -- and their actions as their Nevada business venture imploded during the housing market collapse.
Mamer makes numerous claims, including threats of violence, environmental malfeasance and federal tax violations. Many of those claims came to light in a separate Feb. 1 federal lawsuit filed by Whittemore, who accused the father-and-son Seenos of racketeering, extortion, grand larceny and making threats.
Days earlier, the Seenos had sued Whittemore, then a friend of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, alleging Whittemore embezzled and misappropriated tens of millions of dollars from their joint company.
 As those two cases inch forward, the FBI -- which along with other federal agencies raided the Seeno's Concord headquarters in February 2010 -- continues to investigate potential mortgage fraud. A home sales executive has already been indicted, and prosecutors said they expect more arrests in the fall.
Calls and emails to the Mamer and Seeno attorneys were not returned Wednesday.
'LAWLESS'
Mamer, who served Wingfield and a predecessor for 17 years, claimed that once Seeno Jr. and his son came on board, the company -- which spearheaded a massive development project in the Nevada desert called Coyote Springs -- was "turned into a lawless and hostile environment by the defendants through a pattern of racketeering activity."
The first sign of trouble, Mamer said, was Feb. 19, 2010, the day after the FBI, IRS and Secret Service raided the Seenos' Concord office. Larry Gunderson, CFO for Thomas Seeno, issued an email to Wingfield's bankers, owners and executives -- including Mamer -- saying, "Albert told Tom that he thought they were investigating mortgage loans."
By April 2010, Albert Seeno Jr., became disgruntled with his Wingfield investment, and that July he and his son took over its management, Mamer said.
Among the allegations in Mamer's suit:


  • On Aug. 20, 2010, in a "clandestine-like manner," Seeno III had an information technology director remove company computer servers from Mamer's and Whittemore's homes. Seeno III ordered the IT director to enter Whittemore's house without consent or be fired, and he did. He was still fired shortly after.
  • At a closed-door meeting in October 2010, Seeno III threatened Mamer by saying, "Brad, the 'Seeno Way' is to bend someone over a saw horse and (expletive) them. ... We (expletive) everyone!"
  • On Feb. 25, 2011, Seeno III ordered Mamer to physically threaten Whittemore if a lease payment was not made by BrightSource, a Wingfield tenant and solar power plant operator. Seeno III also told Mamer to tell the BrightSource representative that if they "did not make the lease payment on time, that he would hire the highest-priced environmental attorney in San Francisco, secretly align himself with an environmental group and shut down the Ivanpah job site for at least three years!" The Ivanpah solar power generation site was the largest in the country at the time and awaiting a $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee.

    TAXES
    In early 2011, Mamer claimed McCauley, the Seeno construction company's CFO, discussed with him taking an estimated $25 million federal tax deduction from the failed capital investment, the PGA Village at Coyote Springs.

    McCauley directed Mamer to "develop a historical factual pattern that supported these deductions being shifted from tax year 2009 the year in which the PGA Licensing Agreement was terminated) to tax year 2010," the suit claims. Mamer said the shift would violate federal tax laws.
    On Aug. 17, 2011, Mamer was instructed to work on a tax project related to Coyote Springs planned as a "massive fraudulent misrepresentation claim" against Whittemore, saying Seeno Jr. was not made aware that the project value was gone when he bought into Wingfield, Mamer said.
    ENVIRONMENT
    The Seenos, with their history of California environmental fines, skirted regulations in Nevada, too, Mamer claimed. In October 2010, Mamer said he witnessed unpermitted septic system installations at Coyote Springs and reported it to Nevada regulators, who are investigating.
    The following year, Mamer said he advised the Seenos and senior Wingfield staff members of a series of Coyote Springs environmental permit violations. He estimated more than $1.3 million in fees were owed, in addition to indirect violations. Nothing was done, he said.

    On June 10, 2011, Mamer alerted the Seenos to an Endangered Species Act violation related to a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit issued in regard to the desert tortoise. Compliance would have cost $125,000 and was never done, he said.

    Contact Matthias Gafni at 925-952-5026. Follow him at Twitter.com/mgafni.
    Who's who in Seeno scandal
    As the Seeno family and current and former associates appear in more and more litigation, sorting out who's who can be difficult.
    Here are those listed in Wednesday's lawsuit:
    Plaintiff: Bradley Mamer, of Clark County, Nev., worked for 17 years in Wingfield Nevada Group and its predecessor company. He rose to CEO and president, and now is suing his former bosses.
    Defendant: Albert Seeno Jr., 68, of Clayton, owns interests in numerous Nevada casinos and California development and construction companies. Seeno Jr., his brother and son own companies worth in excess of $4 billion and the collective net worth of the trio as individuals is between $100 million and $2 billion, according to a lawsuit.
    Defendant: Albert Seeno III, 38, of Pittsburg, is the son of Albert Jr. and has pieces of companies similar to what his father owns.
    Defendant: Thomas Seeno, 73, of Alamo, is the older brother of Albert Jr. and went into business with Harvey Whittemore in 2004 to become part owner of Wingfield Nevada Group.
    Defendant: Michael Ghiorso, 59, of Dublin, is Wingfield Nevada Group's director of operations and in 2008 was fined $60,000 by the state insurance commissioner and denied a license, according to the suit.
    Defendant: Kevin McCauley, a licensed CPA, is the CFO of Albert D. Seeno Construction.
    Online
    Read a copy of the lawsuit at ContraCostaTimes.com.


    A lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court accuses three Seenos and their associates of racketeering, including extortion, and mail, wire and tax fraud


























  • Share:

    Southern California Edison - Another Peevey Energy Lobby Murder?


    A successful wife is declared dead from nicotine poisoning - is her "Jeopardy!"-winning husband smart enough to get away with murder?


    Pete Bennett: She was poisoned and he was framed, I was poisoned and almost framed.  I just happen to know PG&E Attorney Howard Golub and his brother Judge Joel Golub.  They both connect to former CPUC President Peevey. 

    The Strack Murders
    My reward was the same poisoning experts killed the Strack Family were poisoned


    The inner circle wins by murder, mayhem and arson?


    Produced by Paul LaRosa, Gayane Keshishyan, Doreen Schechter and Joan Adelman

    To this day, friends like Merry Seabold and Bill Sandretto can't understand why Linda Curry never left her husband, Paul.

    "She's not gonna make it if she stays with him," Merry Seabold told "48 Hours" correspondent Erin Moriarty. "'Linda, I got to get you out of the house. ... Just get out of that house.'"

    "I said, 'You got to get away from him. He's trying to kill you. It's obvious,'" Sandretto said. "I can't believe she wants to stay there.

    Orange County Prosecutor Ebrahim Baytieh is taking on a case that's been unsolved for nearly two decades, but he believes he'll be the one to prove Paul Curry poisoned Linda with nicotine.

    "There's no doubt in my mind that she loved him. She died because she loved him," Baytieh told Moriarty. "Up to the moment she died, that few minutes before midnight on June 9, 1994, in her mind ...'He's the loving husband who's holding my hand who loves me, who plays music for me-- who tells me all the nice stuff.' ...so she wasn't going to believe anything about him."

    Merry Seabold was one of Linda's closest friends.

    "She said, 'Oh Paul is such a good husband. He wouldn't do that,'" Seabold said of Linda.

    Seabold and Linda met in the 1960s, when they both worked at Southern California Edison inside the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant.

    "It was instant bonding," Seabold said of their friendship. "She was tall, I was tall. She loved to eat, I loved to eat and we could eat in those days."

    "What's the first thing that comes to mind when you think about Linda?" Moriarty asked.

    "Fashionista," Seabold replied. "Always nice new outfits with shoes to match, purse to match, earrings to match, bracelets to match."

    The two career women started at entry-level positions but quickly moved up.

    "We were go-getters," said Seabold, "and we wanted to get ahead."

    As Linda advanced in her career, moving from secretary to management, she divorced two husbands and began dating Bill Sandretto, a life insurance salesman.

    "She had a great, personality," Sandretto told Moriarty. "Very loving. We went on trips together. ...We had a great time."

    Linda and Sandretto dated on and off for eight years, but he didn't want to get married.

    "The only thing that was bothering me was the way she spent money," he explained.

    "And she would spend a lot of money?" Moriarty asked.

    "She would spend it. Yeah, for every dollar she made, she spent two," Sandretto said. "I used to go crazy."

    And Linda kept spending, buying herself a big house in San Clemente.

    "I have never seen a more beautiful house in my whole life," said Frankie Thurber, who was a close friend and co-worker. "Linda's house was a dream house. It's where a princess would live."
    Paul and Linda Curry /> And Linda thought she had met her prince when she started dating Paul Curry in 1989. He was 32 and she was 45.

    "...they would talk their little baby talk ... The little nicknames. It was a little bit sickening," Seabold said with a laugh.

    Curry was hired as an engineer to consult at Southern California Edison, teaching the power plant's nuclear engineers about safety issues.

    Mike Flower was Curry's boss.

    "Paul had a sterling reputation. He was extremely smart," Flower said. "The only real complaint most people had with Paul was that he was too smart."

    "But when people would say he's too smart, was that because he's arrogant too or just because he showed everybody else up?" Moriarty asked.

    "He let people know, but in a playful way," said Flower.

    "I thought that he was very egotistical," said Thurber.

    Curry bragged about winning thousands on "Jeopardy!" in the 1980s, and being a member of Mensa, the international society of people with high IQs. But that didn't bother Linda.

    "He thought highly of himself, there was no doubt about it," Seabold said. "He liked to take over the conversation and kinda talk over her. And -- and she would sit back and allow it because, again, she liked showing his intelligence off."

    Linda had some reservations about Curry, but the two got married on Sept. 12, 1992, three years after they began dating.

    Asked if it was a passionate relationship, Seabold told Moriarty, "I don't think passion played into this relationship. ...I think it was a comfort. But it wasn't passion. It wasn't passion."

    "It wasn't looks. ...It wasn't money," Baytieh explained. "It was the idea that, 'I am with somebody who is so brilliant.'"

    Linda also wondered why her much younger new husband seemed so "uninterested."

    "How did you know that they weren't having any sex?" Moriarty asked Sandretto.

    "She told me," he replied.

    And then there were the money issues. Paul and Linda had combined annual salaries of at least $140,000, but Linda noticed she had less money than ever. The reason soon became clear: Curry was helping to support two ex-wives and three children -- families he'd kept hidden from Linda.

    "It was just those little lies that just kept coming up," said Seabold.



    48 Hours Segment Extras
    Two sides of Paul Curry




    Lies and suspicious behavior, like a $1 million life insurance policy Curry asked Linda to buy making him the beneficiary.

    "They had been married maybe a month and she called me one night and says, 'You know Merry, Paul wants to take out a million-dollar life insurance policy on me, what do you think?" Seabold said. "'Are you crazy? Are you kidding me, why would you do that?'"

    "He comes into this marriage with practically nothing ... and she's got a beautiful house, beautiful furniture, beautiful clothes, wonderful circle of friends," Seabold continued. "And what is he bringing to the table? And now he wants a life insurance policy on her for a million dollars? Red flag."

    Linda never got that extra policy, but it hardly mattered because, as Curry knew, Linda already had several life insurance policies worth almost a million dollars and Curry was named the beneficiary on some of them.

    "I said, 'Get him off ... You need to change your life policy right away,'" Sardetto warned Linda. "That's when she told me, she said, 'I'll give it to you.' And I said, 'No, don't give it to me. Give it to your sister.'"

    But Linda, who had been married just half a year at that point in 1993, was torn. So she asked Frankie Thurber, who was then looking for an apartment, to temporarily move into the Curry house and spy on Paul.

    "...she was afraid that Paul didn't really love her and she said, 'Frankie, would you do me a favor? Would you watch Paul and see if you think he's genuine with me that he really cares about me?'" Thurber explained. "And that's when I started watching every move that he made, basically.'"

    Thurber didn't see anything wrong; in fact, quite the opposite.

    "And I went back to her and I said, 'Linda, I, I watched everything, I, I don't see it. He dotes over you. He loves you. He can't do enough for you. I don't know why you would be questioning that,'" she said.

    Even Merry Seabold, never a big fan of Curry, was impressed by the way he pampered Linda.

    "He would prepare these exotic, wonderful new salad dressings as a test and then send her upstairs for a hot bath," she said.

    "Every night he would draw her a bubble bath. I mean huge bubbles. I said, 'Linda, I would kill to have somebody draw me a bubble bath. Of course he loves you,'" said Thurber.

    In July of 1993, just short of her first wedding anniversary, Linda came down with a mysterious illness.

    "She said, 'I just don't feel well. I just don't feel like myself,'" Thurber said. "And she couldn't figure out why all of a sudden she'd get sick."

    Linda became so violently ill that she needed to be hospitalized.

    "When I saw Linda in that bed, honest to god, she looked like an 80-year-old woman," Seabold said. "Her organs were failing ... they said they didn't even know if she's gonna make it that night."
    A MYSTERY ILLNESS & RED FLAGS

    It was July 1993 when Linda Curry was rushed to Samaritan Medical Center in San Clemente.

    "Linda Curry came in with gastrointestinal problems," Registered Nurse Sherry Bundy said. "I was assigned to take care of her that evening ...She was nauseated. She had some vomiting ... I checked her IV."

    Bundy says the IV drip was for hydration. While checking it, she noticed something odd.

    "There was an overhead light ... and I could see the IV bag was cloudy because of the light shining behind it which I knew was not right," she said.

    "How unusual is that?" Moriarty asked.

    "It's very unusual," Bundy replied.

    Bundy reported the incident to hospital brass and the bag was sent to the lab.

    Among Linda's visitors was Bill Sandretto, her former boyfriend.

    "'Oh, my God, Linda,'" Sandretto said. "She was just emaciated, you know."

    "What was the cause of this?" Moriarty asked.

    "They didn't know at the hospital," said Sandretto.

    Poisoning was suspected. Linda was hospitalized for 21 days. She had a stroke and nearly died. And then lab workers discovered lidocaine, a numbing agent, in the contaminated IV bag and reported the incident to the police. They began an investigation that focused on one person: her husband, Paul Curry.

    "This is what's so fascinating about this case. He was a suspect in poisoning her before she died," said prosecutor Ebrahim Baytieh.

    Back then, Baytieh was still in law school. But eventually, in 2006, the case landed on his desk at the Orange County District Attorney's Office. He was surprised to find detectives at the time had audiotaped their interviews with Linda.

    "These are the old microcassettes that they used back in the early to mid-90s," he said, showing Moriarty the tapes. "Very unusual to have a case where you had investigators ask the victim, who ends up getting killed, about the conduct of the person who killed them."


    [Aug. 11, 1993 audiotape interview]

    Detective: Paul is your husband?

    Linda Curry: Uh huh.

    Detective: And how long have you been married?

    Linda Curry: Not quite a year.

    Police investigators interviewed Linda in her hospital bed in August 1993, and zeroed in on the key question:


    [Aug. 11, 1993 audiotape interview]

    Detective: If somebody were trying to do something to you, if they were trying to poison you, any idea who would try to do that?

    Linda Curry: Well, the only person I could think of that would have a motive to do it would be Paul and the only motive I can think of is money but I don't want to really even believe that or think that.

    Linda was candid with detectives, admitting that her new husband was sneaky about money issues and had lied about his past marriages and children. Still, there was one very big "but":


    [Aug. 11, 1993 audiotape interview]

    Detective: Do you still love Paul?

    Linda Curry: Yeah, I love him very much.

    Detective: Do you believe he loves you?

    Linda Curry: I want to believe that he does. He certainly is convincing.

    "Her friends were telling her, 'Run.' Her co-workers were telling her 'run,'" Baytieh said. "You take all that, and she's saying, 'But he loves me and he takes care of me. And I like how I'm feeling because of what he's saying. And I like how I'm feeling because of what he's doing.' And she doesn't run away. She stays."

    Linda stayed with Paul Curry and recovered. In the meantime, the police investigation went nowhere. Then, just five months later, in December 1993, she was again hit with the mystery illness. This time, Curry took her to a different hospital, but the story was much the same.

    Linda's friend, Merry Seabold, was very concerned.

    "She looked like death warmed over, something's happening to her. They don't figure out what it is. I didn't know if she was even going to make it," said Seabold.

    "And how is Paul acting through this?" Moriarty asked Seabold.

    "Caring and involved," she replied.

    But Linda told Seabold that her IV bag had been tampered with yet again. An alarm had gone off soon after a nurse reported seeing Paul Curry leave Linda's room. This time, the hospital staff put a clear sign on Linda's door.

    "It would say, Mr. Curry or husband is ... not allowed unaccompanied into the hospital room," Seabold said of the sign.

    "What did you think when you saw this sign on the door?" Moriarty asked.

    "Well, I knew that other people had a suspicion that perhaps Paul was doing something to his wife," Seabold replied.

    In fact, the police were again called and did a second audio-taped interview. Linda told cops that Paul was running up high credit card bills, but she still remained fiercely loyal:


    Linda Curry interview: He's a wonderful man. I love him and he's always been good to me.

    The next day, detectives interviewed Paul Curry, but he stuck to his story that he had no idea why Linda was getting sick:


    Paul Curry interview: I was completely befuddled when doctors couldn't solve the problem, I couldn't solve the problem...

    With Linda still in the hospital, Seabold found documents in the Curry house that fueled her suspicions about Paul.

    "On the highboy dresser, as I walk into the room, there's a bunch of papers. Well, I just kind of glanced at them, but in big script writing, I saw the word, 'Life insurance' in gold writing. And I went, 'Oh, life insurance.' And then I went, 'Oh, more life insurance policies. Oh, they're all here. They're all out on this highboy dresser, on the top of it.' Now, all the red flags are adding up to crimson. I mean ... it's really red now," she said.

    Seabold questioned Linda after she was released from the hospital.

    "I'm asking her, 'Did ... you have those things out, Linda? Is this something you're looking at?' Well, she hadn't been home. No, not at all. I said, 'Linda, Linda, put it together. Put it together and let's -- let's talk about what's goin' on there.'"

    Seabold warned Linda that she believed Curry was getting ready to cash in by killing Linda.

    "She said, 'You're right. There's something going on and I need to get outta here.' The next day it was like the door slammed on me and she said, 'No, Merry, no. No, I -- I can't. I -- I can't leave Paul," said Seabold.

    "Did she say the reason why she couldn't leave is because she didn't believe that he would do this?" Moriarty asked.

    "You know, she was in such denial," said Seabold.

    Six months went by, and then, on June 9, 1994, Seabold received an email from Paul Curry that said Linda was feeling worse than ever.

    "I said, 'Linda Curry's gonna die. Paul's gonna finally get to poison her and ... she's gonna die,'" she told Moriarty.

    That very evening, sometime around midnight, Curry says he awoke to find Linda barely breathing.

    "Linda did not respond. He calls 911, gives her CPR. Paramedics arrive. No heartbeat, no pulse. Take her to the hospital. She dies," said Baytieh.

    Nurse Bundy heard the news the next day when she reported to work at Samaritan Hospital.

    "My first thought was, 'He finally did it,' and my second thought was somebody really dropped the ball,'" she told Moriarty.
    A FRESH LOOK AT A COLD CASE

    One of the first to hear of Linda Curry's death on that June night in 1994 was Paul Curry's good friend and boss, Mike Flower.

    "I received a phone call about 1:00 in the morning on the night of her death," Flower said. "'Can you come to the -- the home of Paul and Linda Curry?' And I said, 'I'll be right there.'"

    "What did you think?" Erin Moriarty asked.

    "Linda was dead," he replied.

    Like everyone who knew the couple, Flower was aware that Linda had been sick. He rushed to the Curry home in San Clemente.

    "Paul was very emotional. He cried on my shoulder for hours," said Flower.

    "And what did he tell you had happened?" Moriarty asked.

    "'I can't believe she's gone,'" he said.

    The next day, word spread to Linda's good friends Bill Sandretto and Frankie Thurber.

    "Her sister called me," Sandretto said. "I said, 'Oh, my God.'"

    "I said WHAT? She was like a sister to me, she just was -- almost even like a mother to me," said Thurber.

    Merry Seabold heard the news from her husband.

    "I ... knew that ... all my premonitions were true. I knew that it was Paul and I knew that -- no one could save her," she said.






    25 Photos
    Timeline: Investigating the death of Linda Curry




    Linda's friends wondered if Paul had poisoned her by putting something in his special salad dressings and all those bubble baths.

    "He knew everyone was looking at him as a suspect. Didn't you, like, think, no way would this guy actually kill her when he knew he'd be the first suspect?" Moriarty asked Seabold.

    "You know, he was such a con man and -- and such a narcissist and such a psychopath," she said. "I just think he thought ... 'I am so much smarter than anybody, I can do this.'"

    "Paul Curry knew that there is no way he could murder his wife and not be a suspect," Baytieh said. "His objective was not to eliminate himself as a suspect. His objective was to make sure he doesn't get charged with the crime."

    During the autopsy, the medical examiner found an unusual mark behind Linda's right ear that could have been left by a syringe. Then, toxicology reports revealed what Linda's friends had long suspected -- she had been poisoned and now they knew the cause: nicotine, a lot of nicotine.

    "She died from a massive nicotine poisoning. ...Catastrophic levels of nicotine in her system," Baytieh explained. "People say, 'Well, maybe she's a smoker. ...No, she's not a smoker. She doesn't smoke."

    "It's not possible she could've gotten that amount of nicotine over a period of time, building up in her system" Moriarty asked.

    "Absolutely not," said Baytieh.

    The toxicology reports also revealed the presence of a large amount of the generic form of Ambien, a sleeping medication, in Linda's body. Her death was declared a homicide, but there was no evidence to connect Paul Curry to the nicotine, the sleeping pills or a syringe ... so he could not be charged.

    "The fact that he wasn't charged with a crime wasn't because somebody dropped the ball. It's because he was able to cover his tracks," said Baytieh.

    Curry was about to get away with murder -- free to start a new life and to claim the money from Linda's estate.

    "He's told people he's gonna get a million dollars out of it, that was his plan," said Baytieh.

    Not so fast. As it turns out, Linda had drafted a handwritten note giving her sister approximately half her estate. Curry was apoplectic.

    "After he found out that things weren't as easy to get all the money and he called me and he said, 'D-- did you know --d - d - did -- did-- did you know anything about -- about Linda changing and -- and her - and -- and-- and her sister, Pat, is gonna get s - her --,' and he was, like, stuttering," said Seabold.

    But incredibly, despite all of Linda's suspicions, she remained faithful to Paul even in death. She left him her house and close to half-a-million dollars "so he'll be OK," Linda wrote in the note about her estate.

    "If she thought he was killing her, why would she want to leave him money?" Moriarty asked Baytieh.

    "Because she never allowed herself to believe what was obvious to anybody and everybody," the prosecutor replied. "And that's the power of the heart."

    After Linda died, Paul Curry was transferred from his old job at the nuclear power plant. That's when a routine security check revealed a pack of lies in his resume. He was not an engineer; he didn't even have a college degree. The brilliant Mensa member who trained nuclear engineers was a complete fraud.

    "So I called Paul up at the end of the day, and I said, 'Paul, I'm coming in tomorrow morning at 8:00, and I'm gonna fire you unless your resignation is on my fax.' And I came in the next morning and his resignation was on my fax," he said.

    But thanks to Linda, Paul Curry collected $419,000 from two of Linda's life insurance policies and her retirement plan. He also began collecting her retirement benefit of $564 every month. But even with all that money, he let Linda's beloved house slip away.

    "He let the house go into foreclosure," Thurber said. "And ... he got outta Dodge and went to Vegas. And I understand that he got a job as a used car salesman, which I found quite intriguing because a con artist is a really good car salesman."

    But it wasn't long before Curry conned his way into a new job, this time becoming a building inspector. Years went by and the police investigation into Linda Curry's murder came to a complete standstill. The case badly needed a fresh set of eyes.

    Sgt. Yvonne Shull of the Orange County Sheriff's Department was working in the cold case unit when she inherited Linda Curry's murder from a retiring detective. She immediately focused on those old audiotaped interviews of Linda:


    [Aug. 11, 1993 audiotape interview]

    Detective: If somebody were trying to do something to you, if they were trying to poison you, any idea who would try to o that?

    Linda Curry: Well the only person I could think of that would have a motive to do it would be Paul.

    Sargeant Shull began digging into Paul Curry's background.

    "I started with, who is Paul Curry?" Shull said. "Everywhere I looked about Paul Curry, it was false. It was fake."

    For four years, Shull re-examined the entire case and re-interviewed witnesses. She enlisted the help of Detective Mike Thompson, who was an expert at following money trails.

    Thompson looked carefully at all of Linda's insurance claims and also an insurance claim filed by Curry in the days after Linda died. In that report, Curry claimed someone had stolen Linda's 18-karat gold Ladies Presidential Rolex and some other jewelry. He wound up collecting more than $9,000 on that claim.


    48 Hours Segment Extras
    Detective grills murder suspect about dead wife's "stolen" Rolex





    The more Thompson looked at the case, the more he was convinced Curry murdered his wife.

    "This isn't an accident. This isn't an oops. It's not a suicide. It's a homicide," he told Moriarty. "He's being a loving husband to his wife, 'Oh, honey, I'm sorry you're so sick.' And in the back of his mind, he's gotta be thinking, 'How is she not dead?' How much of this nicotine do I got to give her to kill her for crying out loud?!'"

    In 2006, four years after Sgt. Shull picked up the Curry case, she had enough to take it to Baytieh.

    "She says, 'You know, I have this cold case that I've been working on," Baytieh said. "So I said, 'Bring me the file.' ... She comes back a few hours later with about 25 binders."

    Baytieh plunged in, studying the case for three years until 2009, when he reached out to the nicotine expert who had been hired years before to analyze Linda Curry's blood -- Dr. Neal Benowitz.

    "And I said ... 'Do you remember that case?' It didn't take him long to remember, 'Oh yeah, I remember that high level,'" said Baytieh.

    And what Dr. Benowitz had to say shocked Baytieh.

    "He said all he needed to do is to go into a grocery store and buy a pack of cigarettes," he explained.
    OUTSMARTING PAUL CURRY

    Dr. Neal Benowitz, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, is one of the country's preeminent experts on nicotine.

    "How often have you seen nicotine used as a murder weapon?" Erin Moriarty asked.

    "Never," he replied with a laugh. "I've read about it but I've never seen it."

    "Until now?"

    "Until now, yes," Dr. Benowitz said. "This was beyond anything we've ever measured ... levels four or five times higher than anything we'd ever seen before."
    Crimesider: Killer poison -- Nicotine as a murder weapon

    Even after two decades, Benowitz remembers the Linda Curry case because of the "catastrophic" levels of nicotine discovered in her body back in 1994.

    "How do you believe she had to have gotten that nicotine?" Moriarty asked Dr. Benowitz.

    "Well, I think most likely it was by an intravenous injection," he replied.

    It's the only possible explanation says Dr. Benowitz. And remember, the medical examiner did find a puncture mark behind Linda's right ear.

    "Can you say how soon she had to die after she got that dose of nicotine?" Moriarty asked.

    "It was my thought that death must have been within 20 or 30 minutes," said Dr. Benowitz.

    Dr. Benowitz says he does not remember discussing that time frame with the original investigators 20 years ago. But now, says Prosecutor Ebrahim Baytieh, that one fact turns the entire case.

    "The nicotine was introduced into Linda's system during this time frame. And the only other human being who had access to her is Paul Curry," he said.

    Curry's story has always been that on the night Linda died, the two of them were home alone for approximately six hours. Baytieh believes Curry injected Linda after knocking her out with a heavy dose of Ambien.

    "I think ... she comes home. ...He introduces Ambien into her system, whether it's by way of food or a drink or a salad or one of his fancy dressings. When she's out, when she's sedated, he takes that syringe that he had ready with nicotine," Baytieh explained. "He injects her with the nicotine and he waits until he is sure that she's not gonna survive this one."

    But where would Paul Curry get so much nicotine? The answer is frightening -- Curry only needed to buy a pack of cigarettes.

    "If you buy a pack of cigarettes ... you can have 300 milligrams ... of nicotine," Dr. Benowitz explained. "And that's way above the lethal dose for a person."

    The case was rounding into shape, but Baytieh wanted more. Sgt. Yvonne Shull tracked Curry to Salina, Kansas, where he had a new wife, a new son and a new job working as a building inspector. Finally, Curry would have to answer some tough questioning and Shull was ready to take him on face to face.

    "I was afraid that if ... we told him we were from Orange County, that he wouldn't talk to us," Shull told Moriarty.

    So Prosecutor Baytieh came up with a plan to trick Paul Curry into believing he was being questioned by two local detectives who had no knowledge of the case. Shull would be playing the part of "Marie."

    On Nov. 9, 2010, the Salina police chief tells Curry that Orange County investigators are just trying to "close out a death investigation" and so they requested Salina detectives to ask Curry a few questions.

    "The chief of police said, 'Oh, he's a building inspector. He's very smart. He's never gonna talk to you,'" said Shull.

    "What was your reaction when he said yes? Were you shocked?" Moriarty asked.

    "I couldn't believe it. I thought to myself, 'Well, he's not as smart as he thinks he is,'" she replied.

    Det. Furbecks: I guess this involves something with a woman named Linda.

    Paul Curry: That's my -- my ex-wife -- I mean my ex-marriage. She passed away.

    "We go into that interview and our plan was for the first part of it let him think he is in complete control," Baytieh explained. "So he's thinking, 'I'm gonna absolutely run circles around them because they don't know anything about the case, and they're from Kansas, I am smarter than they are.'"

    48 Hours Segment Extras
    "He's very cunning" detective says of Paul Curry





    But then, Shull takes over and the meandering interview becomes a targeted interrogation:


    Sgt. Shull: The night that Linda passed away, you and Linda were alone, correct?

    Paul Curry: Right

    Sgt. Shull: Was there anybody else in the house?

    Paul Curry: No.

    Shull is locking Curry into the story that he's told all these years, leaving him no room to back away from it later:


    Sgt. Shull: So nobody snuck into the house?

    Paul Curry: No.

    Sgt. Shull: there was no burglary in the house?

    Paul Curry: No.

    Sgt. Shull: There was no robbery at the house, nothing like that?

    Paul Curry: No.

    Sgt. Shull: It was just you and Linda?

    Paul Curry: Yes.

    He has now boxed himself in and Shull gives it to him straight:

    Sgt. Shull: Paul, I believe that the cause of Linda's illnesses and the cause of Linda's death are at your hands and before I ask you any other questions, I feel like I need to read you your rights. Paul Curry: Are you arresting me?

    No arrest yet, but for such a smart guy, Paul Curry does not do the smart thing -- he keeps talking:


    Sgt. Shull: Were you slowly poisoning her?

    Paul Curry: No. Sgt. Shull: No.

    Paul Curry: Of course not.

    Sgt. Shull: No.

    Despite the grilling, a detached Curry seems to have other things on his mind. And when Shull leaves the room briefly, Curry shows his impatience:


    Paul Curry: Should I presume that I'm not going to make my 4 o'clock meeting today?

    Det. Furbecks: Yes.

    Paul Curry: And why is that?

    Det. Furbecks: I don't know how long this is gonna take.

    Paul Curry: Well, what is this, that is taking ... does this trump my obligation to my employer? ...This is going to be awfully hard to explain professionally.

    That's the least of Curry's worries:


    Sgt. Shull: At this point Paul you are not free to leave. I am placing you under arrest for the murder of Linda Curry ... My name is Yvonne Shull, my middle name is Marie.

    Finally, 16 years after Linda's death, Paul Curry is called to account for her murder.

    "It felt great to pull out my badge and ID and introduce myself to him. And tell him I was from Orange County and I was there to arrest him. It felt great," Shull told Moriarty.

    But the arrest is just the beginning. Baytieh still has a case full of holes.

    "Even up to today, there's no smoking gun," he said.

    "Or a smoking syringe?" Moriarty commented.

    "Or a smoking anything!" said Baytieh.
    THE TRIAL OF PAUL CURRY

    "He's a monster, a monster who picked his prey and it was my best friend Linda," Merry Seabold said of Paul Curry.

    "He's a liar. How can you live with yourself taking this beautiful, beautiful woman and setting her up to die?" said Frankie Thurber.

    It took 20 years, but in September 2014, Assistant District Attorney Ebrahim Baytieh finally has Paul Curry right where he wants him -- in front of a jury on trial for the murder of his wife, Linda.

    "In this courtroom sits a vicious, cold-blooded murderer, make no mistake about that," Baytieh addressed the court. "He thought he was smarter than everybody else ... she died from nicotine poisoning."

    Baytieh admits the case is no slam dunk.

    "I've had cases where people confess. I've had cases where people say, 'Yep, I shot the victim.' ...Do I have that in this case? Absolutely, not," Baytieh told Moriarty.

    "My obligation is to prove it to you beyond a reasonable doubt," Baytieh told jurors.

    Defense attorney Lisa Kopelman wastes no time pointing out the lack of direct evidence connecting Paul Curry to the murder of his wife.

    "You are never going to hear about how exactly Linda Curry died," Kopelman told the court. "You're never going to hear where the nicotine came from, how it got into her. ...This is a case ... based on suspicion, innuendo, and conjecture."

    Curry is charged with first-degree murder for financial gain, which carries a mandatory life sentence with no possibility of parole.

    "This defendant is as guilty as sin," Baytieh told jurors.

    No surprise, the defense sees things differently.

    "He is an innocent man. The prosecutor uses the word murderer, murderer, murderer," Kopelman said in court.

    Kopelman belittles the case against Curry, questioning those hospital IV bags that appeared to have been tampered with.

    "Come on, this is baloney," she told jurors. "There was no poison ever found in any of those IV bags, there was no fingerprints on it."

    Instead, she tells the jury that Linda had a history of stomach problems dating back to the late '60s, long before she met Paul: "Throughout those years, she went to many, many doctors."

    "All that history is not going to create nicotine in her system out of nowhere," Baytieh told Moriarty.

    The defense argues that Linda was so desperate for a cure that she gave herself an unorthodox remedy - a nicotine enema - and it wound up killing her.

    "One way it got in there was this, through her colon from a nicotine enema," Kopelman told jurors.

    Baytieh can barely contain himself. "It's the enema defense. It's the enema defense," the prosecutor told the court.


    48 Hours Segment Extras
    Defense: Linda Curry caused her own death

    There is no evidence Linda ever gave herself an enema, Baytieh says, and even if there was, it would not explain the undisputed toxic levels of Ambien in Linda's system.

    "Where did that Ambien come from? ... I'm gonna show you. Follow my finger. Right there. That murderer sitting right there," Baytieh said as he pointed at Curry.

    "Do you have any evidence he obtained Ambien? Did he have a prescription? Did she have a prescription?" Moriarty asked Baytieh.

    "The answer to your question is no, no, no, no," he replied. The only pertinent fact, Baytieh says, is that Linda died that June night within 30 minutes of getting that one lethal dose of nicotine and that Paul Curry was the only person who could have administered it.

    "Nobody, other than this defendant, had access to Linda in the six hours before her murder, nobody," Baytieh told jurors. "The defendant had all the motive in the world to murder her, all of it, all of it. He had to cash that check. He had to cash that check. She had to die."

    Paul Curry never takes the stand to explain himself, but Baytieh has a surprise in store.

    "One of the better witnesses that I had is the one that I wasn't able to get to take the stand, Paul Curry, because the day after I signed that piece of paper to get him arrested and he's in custody ... he talks to his current wife then. He's on the phone telling her about what he thinks about our evidence," Baytieh told Moriarty.

    The jailhouse phone call was recorded by authorities and Baytieh plays it for the jury:


    48 Hours Segment Extras
    Jailhouse phone call: "I'm in big trouble"

    Paul Curry: Hey. I'm in trouble. I'm under arrest. I'm in jail.

    Teresa: Tell me what's going on. I don't understand.

    Paul Curry: I'm in big trouble ... I gotta tell you, it looks bad....I mean, other than the fact that there's no physical evidence that I did it and I didn't do it ... they could put me away to prison ... they're serious about this.

    With Paul Curry's own words ringing in their ears, jurors get the case.

    "For me, when a jury starts deliberating, this is when I realize there is nothing else that I could do," said Baytieh.

    The jurors deliberate for a day and a half before reaching a verdict. Sgt. Yvonne Shull, who brought the Curry case back to life in 2002, heads back to the courthouse.

    "Either guilty or not guilty, I didn't think it was gonna hang," Shull said. "I watched the jury come in. And they wouldn't look at me, where previously they would look at me and so I was afraid."

    "I was holding one of Linda's earrings. And our other good friend ... was next to me. And I gave her one of Linda's earrings, and we just held hands and held her earrings in our hands," Seabold said of awaiting the verdict.

    The verdict: Curry is found guilty of murder for financial gain.

    "What did you feel?" Moriarty asked Baytieh following the verdict.

    "Peace," he said. "I wish it was 20 years earlier 'cause he got to enjoy 16 years of freedom."

    48 Hours Segment Extras
    Remembering Linda Curry

    But even the guilty verdict does not answer the ultimate question: why did Linda stay with Paul?

    "She didn't want to admit failure," Thurber said. "...after you've waited that long and you've gone out with that many men, you don't want to admit that you chose the wrong guy."

    "They're really hard to look at because they remind me of obviously my best friend," Merry Seabold said, looking at photos of Linda. "I miss her so much. Because you don't just meet friends, you get 'em for 25 years and then lose 'em. ...And so I'll see her again. I'll see her again.

    In her will, Linda Curry left $10,000 each to 10 special friends, including Merry Seabold and Frankie Thurber.

    © 2015 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    Share:

    Advertisement

    Coming Soon

    Popular Posts

    No one has ever become poor by giving, Please Donate

    Labels

    Subscribe

    Recent Posts

    Recent Posts

    Follow on Facebook

    Popular Posts

    Labels

    Recent Posts

    Unordered List

    • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
    • Aliquam tincidunt mauris eu risus.
    • Vestibulum auctor dapibus neque.

    Pages

    Theme Support

    Need our help to upload or customize this blogger template? Contact me with details about the theme customization you need.