Gaspipelineexplosions.com

EnergyTerrorism.com

The reality of being witness to PG&E explosions

Quick Facts

Main Article

START END
View details »

Related

COL1
COL
COL
COL1

Share:

#PGEWitness @pge_tim #MormonMurders

Quick Facts

 

It's reality time! 

Dear Mr Tim,

It's been almost five years since I intersected with persons connected to the San Bruno Fire.  I was hired by by SVP Paul Redditt now hiding in Brazil.

Suspicious Death
Near KEY
PG&E Employee
Please take a look at the Shit Shack where I sleep. For five years I've been beaten, run off the road, concussions, broken nose, accidents, cars and trucks towed off, all my music gear, and all the pictures of my sons, family gone but that's nowhere close to the pain my family has endured.

Tonight when you go home show this video to your children and get back to me but before you do please call your friend Nixon Peabody Rainmaker whose brother former Judge Joel Golub is seemingly intertwined with these officers.









Howard V. Golub Senior Counsel

San Francisco
Phone: 415-984-8200
Fax: 866-741-3644






WE KNEW
RICK KOPF

Former General Counsel of FremontGroup.com
We also knew Nate Greenan, Pete Bennet, 
Candace Anderson, Patricia Noel (Suicide)
We died by the Sword

#MormonMurders


Why is Nate Greenan holding
Ceremonial Sword?
CALL CHP MARTINEZ
W




They a






View details »

Related

  1. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/A1212027_80669.htm   Cached
    CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists Proceeding: A1212027 - EDISON AND THE CITY Filer: Southern California Edison Company List Name: LIST
  2. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/A1212027_80669.csv
    ... 5121","505 VAN NESS AVENUE","SAN FRANCISCO","CA","94102-3214","" "A1212027","LIST","P","hgolub@nixonpeabody.com","HOWARD V.","GOLUB ... CPUC - EXEC DIV ...
  3. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/A1011015_79627.htm   Cached
    Mar 12, 2015 · california public utilities commission service lists proceeding: a1011015 ... howard v. golub david j. byers, esq. nixon peabody llp attorney at law 1 ...
  4. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/A1106007_79929.csv
    ... SUITE 1300","SAN FRANCISCO","CA","94108-2818","" "A1106007","LIST","P","hgolub@nixonpeabody.com","HOWARD V.","GOLUB ... @landuselaw.net ... @cpuc.ca .gov","NIKI ...
  5. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/A1106007_79929.htm   Cached
    Dec 26, 2014 · CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists Proceeding: A1106007 - EDISON - TO ESTABLIS Filer: Southern California Edison Company List Name: LIST
  6. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/R1408013_82423.htm   Cached
    Mar 26, 2015 · CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists Proceeding: R1408013 - CPUC - OIR REGARDING Filer: CPUC List Name: LIST Last changed: March 26, 2015
  7. www.cpuc.ca.gov/service_lists/R0705025_75465.htm   Cached
    Mar 17, 2015 · CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists Proceeding: R0705025 - CPUC - OIR REGARDING Filer: CPUC List Name: LIST Last changed: March 17, 2015
  8. www.lawseminars.com/detail.php?SeminarCode=13RESCA   Cached
    Howard V. Golub, Esq., Program Co-Chair Nixon Peabody LLP / San Francisco, CA 8:45 am ... California Public Utilities Commission / San Francisco, CA
  9. www.linkedin.com/pub/howard-golub/41/546/a74
    View Howard Golub's professional profile on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is the world's largest business network, helping professionals like Howard Golub discover inside ...
  10. www.lawseminars.com/detail.php?SeminarCode=14RESCA   Cached
    At Law Seminars International, ... the latest information on developments at the California Public Utilities Commission and California ... Howard V. Golub, .
COLss








COL
COL1
Share:

Judge Joel Golub: Commission Charges Bay Area Judge With Interfering in Son’s Case

Quick Facts

Boy Scouts of America


Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Page 1

Commission Charges Bay Area Judge With Interfering in Son’s Case

By KENNETH OFGANG, Staff Writer

The Commission on Judicial Performance has charged a Contra Costa Superior Court judge with interfering in a case involving the judge’s son.
In a notice of formal proceedings, made public yesterday, the commission said Judge Bruce C. Mills has been accused of willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and improper action, charges that could result in his removal from the bench.
The allegations stem from the issuance of a citation for possession of tobacco to Mills’ minor son in October 2010. The commission explained in the notice that the case was assigned to Commissioner Joel Golub, and Mills’ son appeared before Golub in March of last year, pled guilty to an infraction, and ordered him to do 20 hours of volunteer work. 
Both Golub and Mills sit in Walnut Creek. (Traffic Court Fines) The judge’s son was enrolled in a residential treatment program and did not complete the volunteer work, the commission said, and was ordered to appear before Golub in October of last year. 
Conversation With Clerk
The commission accused Mills of initiating a conversation with Golub’s clerk, in which the judge allegedly asked the clerk to call his son’s case early so that the son’s attorney would not have to wait. 
“You told the clerk you wanted your son to get credit for the time spent in the program, and showed her documents reflecting payments made to the program provider,” the commission said in the notice. “The clerk told you or confirmed to you that Commissioner Golub was absent and that the calendar was being handled by a judge pro tern.”
The judge, the CJP alleged, subsequently told the clerk that the attorney was unable to appear, and that he would be appearing instead. 
The commission further alleged:
“The clerk either knew that you had a 1:30 p.m. calendar or asked if you did, and raised the idea that you could possibly speak to the judge pro tem before the afternoon calendar...was called. You indicated that you would like to do so.
“You then spoke to the judge pro tem in her chambers about your son’s case, off the record, before she called the afternoon calendar. You told the judge pro tem that your son was in a program out of state and that you wanted him to receive credit toward the volunteer work requirement for being in the residential program. After questioning you about the program, the judge pro tem agreed to grant your request. No proceedings were conducted in open court on your son’s case.”
Canons of Ethics
By that conduct, the commission alleged, Mills violated canons of ethics requiring that judges uphold the integrity of the judiciary; avoid impropriety and promote public confidence; refrain from using the prestige of the judiciary to advance private interests; and avoid ex parte communications, other than in specified situations.
The judge’s formal response to the charges is due Nov. 20, the commission said. Mills’ attorney, James A. Murphy of San Francisco, could not be reached for comment.
Mills, a 1984 graduate of Lewis and Clark Law School in Oregon, practiced at a Walnut Creek firm until 1986, and was a deputy district attorney for Contra Costa County from 1987 until 1995, when he was appointed to the Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court by then-Gov. Pete Wilson. He became a Contra Costa Superior Court judge through unification in 1998. 
He was publicly admonished by the commission in 2006 for having improper ex parte discussions with a defendant, a lawyer, and a probation officer and for making inappropriate remarks from the bench. 
The commission found that Mills had, among other things, made “sarcastic and discourteous” remarks regarding a defendant whom the judge believed was faking an inability to speak English. 
Judge Mills has engaged in a pattern of making comments that are discourteous, sarcastic, demeaning and belittling to those appearing before him,” the commission said at the time. “Such remarks toward a litigant or counsel are not consistent with the conduct required by canon 3B(4),” requiring that judges conduct their official duties in a patient and dignified manner. 
The commission also found that in 1997, Mills had improperly granted diversion after chambers discussions involving the defense lawyer, the defendant, and the probation officer—who had originally suggested that the defendant was ineligible—after the defendant’s no contest plea had been accepted and the prosecutors had left the courthouse.

Copyright 2012, Metropolitan News Company


View details »

Related

COL1
COL
COL
COL1

Share:

CPUC/PG&E Search Warrants

Quick Facts

COL1
COL
COL
COL1

Share:

From United States Code TITLE 18 > PART I (Crimes): CHAPTER 63—MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER FRAUD OFFENSES

 From United States Code TITLE 18 > PART I (Crimes): CHAPTER 63—MAIL FRAUD AND OTHER FRAUD OFFENSES
·  § 1341. Frauds and swindles
·  § 1342. Fictitious name or address
·  § 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television
·  § 1344. Bank fraud
·  § 1345. Injunctions against fraud
·  § 1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
·  § 1347. Health care fraud
·  § 1348. Securities fraud
·  § 1349. Attempt and conspiracy
·  § 1350. Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports
·  § 1351. Fraud in foreign labor contracting

§ 1341. Frauds and swindles

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

§ 1342. Fictitious name or address

Whoever, for the purpose of conducting, promoting, or carrying on by means of the Postal Service, any scheme or device mentioned in section 1341 of this title or any other unlawful business, uses or assumes, or requests to be addressed by, any fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address or name other than his own proper name, or takes or receives from any post office or authorized depository of mail matter, any letter, postal card, package, or other mail matter addressed to any such fictitious, false, or assumed title, name, or address, or name other than his own proper name, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

 

§ 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. If the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized, transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed, or paid in connection with, a presidentially declared major disaster or emergency (as those terms are defined in section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5122)), or affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

§ 1344. Bank fraud

Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—
(1) to defraud a financial institution; or
(2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;
shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

§ 1345. Injunctions against fraud

 (a)
(1) If a person is—
(A) violating or about to violate this chapter or section 287, 371 (insofar as such violation involves a conspiracy to defraud the United States or any agency thereof), or 1001 of this title;
(B) committing or about to commit a banking law violation (as defined in section 3322 (d) of this title); or
(C) committing or about to commit a Federal health care offense;
the Attorney General may commence a civil action in any Federal court to enjoin such violation.
(2) If a person is alienating or disposing of property, or intends to alienate or dispose of property, obtained as a result of a banking law violation (as defined in section 3322 (d) of this title) or a Federal health care offense or property which is traceable to such violation, the Attorney General may commence a civil action in any Federal court—
(A) to enjoin such alienation or disposition of property; or
(B) for a restraining order to—
(i) prohibit any person from withdrawing, transferring, removing, dissipating, or disposing of any such property or property of equivalent value; and
(ii) appoint a temporary receiver to administer such restraining order.
(3) A permanent or temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.
(b) The court shall proceed as soon as practicable to the hearing and determination of such an action, and may, at any time before final determination, enter such a restraining order or prohibition, or take such other action, as is warranted to prevent a continuing and substantial injury to the United States or to any person or class of persons for whose protection the action is brought. A proceeding under this section is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except that, if an indictment has been returned against the respondent, discovery is governed by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

§ 1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”

For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

§ 1347. Health care fraud

Whoever knowingly and willfully executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—
(1) to defraud any health care benefit program; or
(2) to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any health care benefit program,
in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. If the violation results in serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of this title), such person shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and if the violation results in death, such person shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both.

§ 1348. Securities fraud

Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—
(1) to defraud any person in connection with any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78l) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o (d)); or
(2) to obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any money or property in connection with the purchase or sale of any security of an issuer with a class of securities registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l) or that is required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o (d));
shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than 25 years, or both.

§ 1349. Attempt and conspiracy

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this chapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.

§ 1350. Failure of corporate officers to certify financial reports

(a) Certification of Periodic Financial Reports.— Each periodic report containing financial statements filed by an issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m (a) or 78o (d)) shall be accompanied by a written statement by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer (or equivalent thereof) of the issuer.
(b) Content.— The statement required under subsection (a) shall certify that the periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act pf [1] 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer. 
(c) Criminal Penalties.— Whoever—
(1) certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport with all the requirements set forth in this section shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; or
(2) willfully certifies any statement as set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of this section knowing that the periodic report accompanying the statement does not comport with all the requirements set forth in this section shall be fined not more than $5,000,000, or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

§ 1351. Fraud in foreign labor contracting

Whoever knowingly and with intent to defraud recruits, solicits or hires a person outside the United States for purposes of employment in the United States by means of materially false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises regarding that employment shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
Share:

#NixonPeabody - The Connection to Pete Bennett

Quick Facts 

 

Main Article

START END
View details »

Related

COL1
COL
COL
COL1

Share:

#TheSerialArsonNetwork

Quick Facts

Main Article

San Ramon Valley Regional Fire Protection District 

 

 


COL1
COL
COL
COL1

Share:

Advertisement

Coming Soon

Popular Posts

No one has ever become poor by giving, Please Donate

Labels

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Follow on Facebook

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Unordered List

  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  • Aliquam tincidunt mauris eu risus.
  • Vestibulum auctor dapibus neque.

Pages

Theme Support

Need our help to upload or customize this blogger template? Contact me with details about the theme customization you need.