Gaspipelineexplosions.com

EnergyTerrorism.com

Debunking the San Bruno "Accidental Explosion"


Two Vie





This #pgeWitness says #pgeGasCanMan http://goo.gl/e46xsO ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-OfeW_4Muc
Oct 31, 2013 - Uploaded by Pete Bennett
PG&E San Bruno Explosion Sept 2010 - Domestic Terrorism: Suspects: Connected to Kinder Morgan ...
You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 6/19/18


PeteBennett.net found on youtube - narrative - YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_pqR26GiiA
Oct 31, 2013 - Uploaded by Pete Bennett
San Bruno Fire - View from Gas Station - showing explosion traveling nearly 1/4 mile, appearing to be an ...


Share:

PG&E Media Request - Problems with Ethics Program and WilmerHale.com




PG&E TAKES ACTION TO ADDRESS EX PARTE COMMUNICATION ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN SELF-REPORT TO CPUC TODAY; PLEDGES 'NO EXCUSES' COMPLIANCE


Release Date: September 15, 2014

Contact: PG&E External Communications (415) 973-5930

San Francisco, Calif.— Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) today notified the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that an extensive internal review of nearly five years of emails between the company and officials at the Commission has identified a number of instances in which PG&E believes it violated the CPUC's rules governing communications with the state regulator in the pending Gas Transmission & Storage rate case.

The communications reported to the CPUC today occurred over a three-week period in January, 2014, during which time a number of e-mails were sent to the CPUC concerning the assignment of administrative law judges and commissioners to the Gas Transmission & Storage rate case. These e-mails may have violated CPUC rules prohibiting certain ex parte communications -- meaning communication with decision-makers that takes place without the knowledge of all parties to a proceeding.

These communications were identified after the company voluntarily chose to broaden its internal review of any potential ex parte communications well beyond those communications referenced in a San Bruno motion filed last July. The expanded review included more than 65,000 emails to and from the Commission since early 2010.

Actions to Address

"As a company, we must be committed to complying with both the letter and the spirit of the law and PG&E's own Code of Conduct at all times. No excuses. That is, and must be, the standard for our behavior individually and as a company," Chairman and CEO Tony Earley and President Chris Johns said in a joint letter to employees today.

They outlined actions resulting from the internal review process:
Three officers will no longer be employed by the company. They are the senior vice president of regulatory affairs, vice president of regulatory relations, and vice president of regulatory proceedings and rates.
PG&E has appointed Steve Malnight as senior vice president of regulatory relations. Previously, Malnight was vice president of customer energy solutions. Malnight will report to PG&E President Chris Johns.
The company is creating the new role of chief regulatory compliance officer, whose mandate will be to help oversee compliance with all requirements governing PG&E’s interactions with the CPUC. The position will report to Chairman and CEO Tony Earley and to the Audit Committee of the PG&E Board of Directors.
The company has engaged Ken Salazar, a partner in the WilmerHale law firm, as special counsel on regulatory compliance matters to assist in developing a best-in-class regulatory compliance model. Salazar has deep experience in regulatory and energy matters. Among his roles has been service as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Senator from Colorado, Attorney General of Colorado and Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
PG&E plans additional, mandatory training for all employees who routinely interact with PG&E's regulators.


Letter to Employees


In their joint letter announcing these actions to employees, Earley and Johns said, in part:


"As a company, we must be committed to complying with both the letter and the spirit of the law and PG&E's own Code of Conduct at all times. No excuses. That is, and must be, the standard for our behavior individually and as a company.


"We all have a responsibility to know, understand and comply with all of the rules, including PG&E's own Code of Conduct, as they apply to our respective roles.


"In these instances, there was behavior that clearly failed to meet that standard, and we greatly regret that. Even absent an ex parte violation, these actions did not represent the company in the manner we expect of our officers. As a result, we took immediate and definitive action. We’re continuing this review and will take additional actions if warranted.


"Beyond that, it is also clear that we need to take additional steps to raise the level of professionalism and propriety in our interactions with regulators. While many of us have felt that criticism characterizing PG&E's relationship with the CPUC as 'cozy' has been unfair, we need to acknowledge that we have earned some of the criticism and we need to take action to change that.


"As we have said previously, we have been very disappointed by the tone of some emails that have been reviewed. While not violations of regulations, they are unprofessional and unacceptable.




"We've made truly incredible progress in terms of our operational focus and in creating a strong safety culture at PG&E. But to be successful, it's also critical that our culture demonstrates an unfailing commitment to conducting our business in compliance with both the letter and spirit of the law and our Code of Conduct and with a high degree of professionalism."


PG&E's filing with the CPUC can be read here.


About PG&E




Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG), is one of the largest combined natural gas and electric utilities in the United States. Based in San Francisco, with more than 20,000 employees, the company delivers some of the nation’s cleanest energy to nearly 16 million people in Northern and Central California. For more information, visit www.pge.com/ and https://www.pge.com/about/newsroom/.
Share:

Cromwell Uranium Corp.





SOURCE: Cromwell Uranium Corp.
July 16, 2007 09:00 ET

Cromwell Uranium Corp. Completes Acquisition of Cromwell Uranium Holdings Inc.

SCOTTSDALE, AZ--(Marketwire - July 16, 2007) - Cromwell Uranium Corp. (OTCBBCWLU) today is pleased to announce the completion of its acquisition by merger of Cromwell Uranium Holdings Inc. on July 11, 2007. The transaction is described in a current report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on July 13, 2007.
Cromwell Uranium acquired Cromwell Holdings, in exchange for its issuance of 31,000,000 shares of common stock to the shareholders of Cromwell Holdings in a transaction which was exempt from the registration requirements of federal and state securities laws.
As a result of the merger and related transactions, and as of July 11, 2007, Cromwell Uranium has 56,193,002 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. The former shareholders of Cromwell Holdings own 31,000,000 shares of Cromwell Uranium common stock, representing approximately 55% of the issued and outstanding shares.
As part of the transaction, Robert McIntosh, David Naylor and Graeme Scott were appointed to Cromwell Uranium's board of directors on July 11, 2007. Additionally, Robert McIntosh was appointed our President and Chief Executive Officer, and David Naylor appointed as our Chief Financial Officer. Concurrently,
David Rector resigned as President, Secretary and Treasurer of our company and remains as a director of our company, and Karen Law resigned as a director.
With the recent rise in the price of uranium to over $135 per pound, Cromwell Uranium Corp. has assembled a portfolio of uranium projects that includes the Monmouth Uranium Project. Monmouth is located in Central Ontario Canada, a 1.5-hour drive north of Toronto, near Gooderham Ontario. Cromwell has two other exploration projects located near Elliott Lake and Long Lac Ontario, Canada. The Monmouth Uranium Project is significant to the Company due to the historical work that has been performed.
Uranium was discovered at Monmouth in the early 1950s. The operators at that time conducted surface trenching across approximately 1,000 feet that showed grades 0.14% U3O8 over 35 trenches and had limited follow-up drilling. A trenching and drilling program was completed in the late 1960s that included a qualifying report by S.W. Evans for the owner at that time, Northern Nuclear in 1968. The geology at Monmouth is comprised of Uranium crystals disseminated in an altered limestone (skarn) with a thickness 15-60 feet. This skarn horizon has been mapped for a length of 6,000 feet. Only 1,500 feet of the strike length has been explored to some detail. All historical drill holes cut uranium mineralization ranging from 1/10 pound to over 6 pounds of uranium per ton.
Previous operators estimated from drilling the potential of 2 million tons containing 0.45% (0.9) pounds per ton or 1,800,000 pounds of U3O8. The Monmouth Uranium Project is open along strikes to the northeast and southwest and down dip to the southeast. The Company believes that the low cost mining factors due to proximity to infrastructure combined with the 1970 metallurgical test that shows 80 plus percent recovery by simple gravity separation, demonstrate a potential for a reliable low cost producing uranium deposit. The Company anticipates that due to the scope of limited work in the 1950s and 1960s that the Monmouth Uranium Project has the potential to expand on the estimates of previous operators. Cromwell is conducting a prospecting, geological mapping and surface trenching program at this time.
ABOUT CROMWELL URANIUM CORP.
Cromwell Uranium Corp. is an exploration Company which intends to develop Uranium assets in North America. Cromwell's initial asset, the Monmouth Uranium Project is envisioned to have the potential of a low cost, open pit uranium producer located close to infrastructure and end product buyers.
Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This news release contains "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in Section 27A of the United States Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements in this press release which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements and include any statements regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, the development, costs and results of our exploration program at our uranium properties and any anticipated future production.
Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to numerous factors. Such factors include, among others, the inherent uncertainties associated with mineral exploration and development stage exploration companies. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this news release, and we assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the beliefs, plans, expectations and intentions contained in this press release are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions will prove to be accurate. Investors should consult all of the information set forth herein and should also refer to the risk factors disclosure outlined in our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the most recent fiscal year, our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB and other periodic reports filed from time-to-time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
Cromwell Uranium Corp.
Robert McIntosh-President
To find out more about Cromwell Uranium Corp. (OTCBBCWLU), visit our website at www.cromwelluraniumcorp.com

CONTACT INFORMATION

  • Investor Information:
    1-888-298-9483
    Cromwell Uranium Corp.
Share:

Former FBI Agent Richard L. Lambert sues over AMERITHRAX

Share:

Five Dead in Utah was relatives of unpaid PG&E Programmer

Five Dead in Utah was relatives of unpaid PG&E Programmer
Share:

REALLY? PG&E TAKES ACTION TO ADDRESS EX PARTE COMMUNICATION ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN SELF-REPORT TO CPUC TODAY; PLEDGES 'NO EXCUSES' COMPLIANCE

PG&E TAKES ACTION TO ADDRESS EX PARTE COMMUNICATION ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN SEL


F-REPORT TO CPUC TODAY; PLEDGES 'NO EXCUSES' COMPLIANCE

Release Date: September 15, 2014
Contact: PG&E External Communications (415) 973-5930
San Francisco, Calif.— Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) today notified the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that an extensive internal review of nearly five years of emails between the company and officials at the Commission has identified a number of instances in which PG&E believes it violated the CPUC's rules governing communications with the state regulator in the pending Gas Transmission & Storage rate case.
The communications reported to the CPUC today occurred over a three-week period in January, 2014, during which time a number of e-mails were sent to the CPUC concerning the assignment of administrative law judges and commissioners to the Gas Transmission & Storage rate case. These e-mails may have violated CPUC rules prohibiting certain ex parte communications -- meaning communication with decision-makers that takes place without the knowledge of all parties to a proceeding.
These communications were identified after the company voluntarily chose to broaden its internal review of any potential ex parte communications well beyond those communications referenced in a San Bruno motion filed last July. The expanded review included more than 65,000 emails to and from the Commission since early 2010.
Actions to Address
"As a company, we must be committed to complying with both the letter and the spirit of the law and PG&E's own Code of Conduct at all times. No excuses. That is, and must be, the standard for our behavior individually and as a company," Chairman and CEO Tony Earley and President Chris Johns said in a joint letter to employees today.
They outlined actions resulting from the internal review process:
  • Three officers will no longer be employed by the company. They are the senior vice president of regulatory affairs, vice president of regulatory relations, and vice president of regulatory proceedings and rates.
  • PG&E has appointed Steve Malnight as senior vice president of regulatory relations. Previously, Malnight was vice president of customer energy solutions. Malnight will report to PG&E President Chris Johns.
  • The company is creating the new role of chief regulatory compliance officer, whose mandate will be to help oversee compliance with all requirements governing PG&E’s interactions with the CPUC. The position will report to Chairman and CEO Tony Earley and to the Audit Committee of the PG&E Board of Directors.
  • The company has engaged Ken Salazar, a partner in the WilmerHale law firm, as special counsel on regulatory compliance matters to assist in developing a best-in-class regulatory compliance model. Salazar has deep experience in regulatory and energy matters. Among his roles has been service as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Senator from Colorado, Attorney General of Colorado and Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources.
  • PG&E plans additional, mandatory training for all employees who routinely interact with PG&E's regulators.
Letter to Employees
In their joint letter announcing these actions to employees, Earley and Johns said, in part:
"As a company, we must be committed to complying with both the letter and the spirit of the law and PG&E's own Code of Conduct at all times. No excuses. That is, and must be, the standard for our behavior individually and as a company.
"We all have a responsibility to know, understand and comply with all of the rules, including PG&E's own Code of Conduct, as they apply to our respective roles.
"In these instances, there was behavior that clearly failed to meet that standard, and we greatly regret that. Even absent an ex parte violation, these actions did not represent the company in the manner we expect of our officers. As a result, we took immediate and definitive action. We’re continuing this review and will take additional actions if warranted.
"Beyond that, it is also clear that we need to take additional steps to raise the level of professionalism and propriety in our interactions with regulators. While many of us have felt that criticism characterizing PG&E's relationship with the CPUC as 'cozy' has been unfair, we need to acknowledge that we have earned some of the criticism and we need to take action to change that.
"As we have said previously, we have been very disappointed by the tone of some emails that have been reviewed. While not violations of regulations, they are unprofessional and unacceptable.

"We've made truly incredible progress in terms of our operational focus and in creating a strong safety culture at PG&E. But to be successful, it's also critical that our culture demonstrates an unfailing commitment to conducting our business in compliance with both the letter and spirit of the law and our Code of Conduct and with a high degree of professionalism."
PG&E's filing with the CPUC can be read here.
About PG&E
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation (NYSE:PCG), is one of the largest combined natural gas and electric utilities in the United States. Based in San Francisco, with more than 20,000 employees, the company delivers some of the nation’s cleanest energy to nearly 16 million people in Northern and Central California. For more information, visit www.pge.com/ and https://www.pge.com/about/newsroom/.
Share:

Advertisement

Coming Soon

Popular Posts

No one has ever become poor by giving, Please Donate

Labels

Subscribe

Recent Posts

Recent Posts

Follow on Facebook

Popular Posts

Labels

Recent Posts

Unordered List

  • Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
  • Aliquam tincidunt mauris eu risus.
  • Vestibulum auctor dapibus neque.

Pages

Theme Support

Need our help to upload or customize this blogger template? Contact me with details about the theme customization you need.