HELMANTOLER v. CITY OF CONCORD

Foul Ball Same Firms

Druggist used pain patches to end his life / Walnut Creek ...

www.sfgate.com/.../Druggist-used-pain-patches-t...

San Francisco Chronicle

Mar 29, 2002 - Sheets had not made any suicide threats, and his wife was not worried that he'd ... Jamey Phillip Sheets, 32, who owned just under half of Doc's ...

You've visited this page many times. Last visit: 10/7/15

 

HELMANTOLER v. CITY OF CONCORD

Case No. CV 14-02855 VC.

ALANY JEAN HELMANTOLER, T.H., K.H., and M.H., minors, through their guardian ad litem ALANY JEAN HELMANTOLER, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CONCORD, OFFICER O'BRIEN, OFFICER DONNELLY, OFFICER GOLVINEAUX, SERGEANT ELSBERRY, and DOES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

February 2, 2015.

JAMES V. FITZGERALD, III, NOAH G. BLECHMAN, LAURA A. COX, McNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY, BORGES & AMBACHER LLP, Walnut Creek, CA, Attorney for Defendants, CITY OF CONCORD, OFFICER O'BRIEN, OFFICER, DONNELLY, OFFICER GOLVINEAUX, SERGEANT, ELSBERRY.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN F. MARTIN, John F. Martin, Marta R. Vanegas, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, ALANY JEAN HELMANTOLER, T.H., K.H., and M.H., minors, through their guardian ad litem ALANY, JEAN HELMANTOLER.

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to this action, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
WHEREAS this civil rights action is currently pending in the above entitled Court and has case management deadlines as set forth in the Court's Minute Entry of September 24, 2014 (ECF Doc. 24), dates set at the Case Management Conference of September 23, 2014.
WHEREAS the parties performed some key discovery prior to mediation and then recently attended mediation on January 15, 2015, which was not successful. Other discovery now needs to be completed and there is insufficient time for the parties to do so prior to the current deadline of February 13, 2015, for expert disclosure and March 6, 2015, for the fact discovery cut-off. In addition, the parties want to move back expert disclosure and expert discovery deadlines in this case.
WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and have agreed to the following modifications to the current deadlines in this case as follows:
Description Current Deadline New Deadline Expert Disclosure February 13, 2015 March 6, 2015 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure February 23, 2015 March 16, 2015 Fact Discovery Cut Off March 6, 2015 March 20, 2015 Expert Discovery Cut Off March 20, 2015 April 24, 2015 WHEREAS none of these new proposed dates will modify the deadline to file dispositive motions (April 2, 2015), the Final Pretrial Conference (June 16, 2015) or the Trial Date (June 29, 2015) set in this matter.
WHEREAS good cause exists to reset these case management deadlines per the parties' agreement.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, THE PARTIES NEW PROPOSED DEADLINES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
Description New Deadline Expert Disclosure March 6, 2015 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure March 16, 2015 Fact Discovery Cut Off March 20, 2015 Expert Discovery Cut Off April 24, 2015 ALL OTHER RELEVANT DEADLINES SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.